Half-life 2 or Doom3? Serious descussion

The Viking
🚂 Steam Linked
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Sep 29, 2002
Messages
4,803
Best answers
0
There is no feckin story in d00m, it's only "right on cowboy, get teh shotgun and kill as many as you can, yeehaaw! Half-life is way more interesting, i mean, the story in hl 1 was just awesome, if they come up with another storyline that's as good as hl1, then my choice is easily made, a game is not about graphics, a game needs a story, a plot, no find the key with the matching door, and blast some scareh dolls. It's half-life all the way. I used to like doom though, since it was one of the first 3d shoot em ups, i must have played it 3 times, it was new and fresh, but after a little while it became old, and boring, then came half-life, atm i'm playing the SP for 9th time, can you imagine to do the same with Doom? Don't think so, and i'm saying to add doom to your trashcan, if you like shoot em up without using brains, then it's a hell lot of fun, but i prefer a good storyline, that's also why i'm totally addicted to rpg's. Anyways, my vote is Half-Life 2, for sure!
 
Senior Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 6, 2002
Messages
1,675
Best answers
0
Alot of people are saying they don't like Doom because of it's lack of a story, can we look at it like this? Half-life and Doom have almost exactly the same story with different characters and enemies.

How so? Alright let's figure it out,

-----------------

How did monsters get in Doom?
Scientists opened up a portal to another place.

How did monsters get in Half life?
Scientists opened up a portal to another place.

What is the main objective of Doom?
Get out alive.

What is the main objective of Half life?
Get out alive.

What environment is Doom set in?
A locked down military style compound.

What environment is Half Life set in?
A locked down military style compound.


-----------------

When you actually put the games side by side, niether has more story then the other except some guy from an organization keeps trying to kill and hire you. So stop saying "Well I want a game with a storyline!" because it's almost the same, damn, thing.
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
1,887
Best answers
0
YEah but in doom 2 there was no story devellopement what so ever ingame, the only thing they had was the intro in the instruction manual...

I assume doom3 will have some what of a story development, but i feel hl2 will be a step ahead of it.
 
Fumoffu!
Retired Forum Staff
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
2,888
Best answers
0
I would seriously go for HL2, not only for the larger fan base and history of Valve - but also because of the mod-possibilities that it will hold.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 14, 2002
Messages
2,789
Best answers
0
umm, hl was set in Black maysa(sp?), not a military compound.

Compairing doom too HL and saying its the same story wize for those reasons alone is laughable, im not even going to go into any lengh with telling you how dumb you looked.
 
The Viking
🚂 Steam Linked
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Sep 29, 2002
Messages
4,803
Best answers
0
Also in doom you where on another planet, where those aliens came from, in hl it was on earth.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
2,490
Best answers
0
Hsu said:
From what I have seen of doom 3 it looks just like doom 1-2 but with a really nice lighting system. Also I have not heard a thing about its physics system or story... I actually remember reading an interview with one of the guys that works for id that doom 3 will have very little story at all. Just a marine with guns killing anything in site. Also gameplay seems to be pretty bad aswell, where most of the game consists of killing everything in the level and find the red, blue and yellow key cards to advance to the next level.
That was the most blindfolded blanket description of Doom that I have ever heard....

There is a great deal more story in this one. In the first one, there was NO DIALOGUE, and ONE HUMAN CHARACTER, with HORDES OF MONSTERS RUNNING AT HIM. Held all together extremely loosely by brief intermissions every nine levels with really rotten dungeons and dragons narratives. How could it be the same?!

The first level of Doom has your character confused. He gets separated from his squad and cannot raise them on radio. Spotting a flare in a far off tower or something of that nature, you begin to make your way to the area. Along the way you will find wounded soldiers and scientists and there will be several scripted events as well. Then you begin to find out what happened at Phobos Station. This is only the first level, as reviewed by Lamespy.

As for the physics system...Doom 3 is one of the first games to use true per-pixel hit technology. If you shoot a missile at my character, and it goees between my legs, or under my armpit, you don't hit me--it's like real life hit detection. The lighting system is part of the atmosphere...which HL2 will probably have none of, since it's a less artsy crew making the game.

The gameplay is objective based and is presumed to be similar to HL's. You are a guy trying to find his people and figure out what the hell happened...not "dude in level 1-b with blue key." It's going to be more in-depth and I for one have a lot of faith in Master Carmack, even if his company is not behind him in the slightest.

Doom 3 wasn't meant for modding, and nowhere in there did they ever claim for it to be. So I don't think it should be even judged based on that. It's like racing a bike and a drag racer. While they both are the same thing inherently, they just aren't meant for the same purposes.

Doom III is meant to be intimidating to play, and scary in a really eerie paranoid vibe sort of way (Half Life 1 did that completely by accident, make no mistake). Doom 3's story is of course going to seem weak because--guess what?!--we all know it already.

However, I suspect it is going to be far more indepth this time around. Supporting characters and storylines will be a bigger deal in this one, as will (hopefully) the scientific explanation of what the hell is happening on Phobos Base will be.

It's not going to be the same thing as the old dooms...it's going to be "Half-Life with Atmosphere and Demons." Which brings me to my conclusion: they'll be relatively equal.

Personally, me and my Radeon 9700 Pro are going to have a blast buying them both.

You whelps who speak down about Doom have forgotten the faces of your forefathers! If nothing else, the guy who INVENTED THE GENRE and INVENTED 3D GAMING and INVENTED MULTIPLAY deserves a fair chance.

And even though Hsu said not to, I've played the leaked alpha and the game DOES scare you atmospherically. When you get doom 3, sit alone, with all the lights off, and your surround sound on, and see if you don't wet your pants.

I think half-life gets a little too much credit from these young'uns nowadays. That game...it was good, but it wasn't the innovative masterpiece people made it out to be. It was just the first game to take the next logical steps forward.

Half-life 2 will be phenomenal, no doubt. But I don't see why it's necessary to peg it as better just because all the 11-year-old Kazaa grabass-*****es can download new games for free on Daddy's pavillion business laptop.

But then again only mature people would understand my point anyway. So what, HL2 can do mods? Big whoop. If anyone ever DOES make a mod for Doom 3, yeah it's harder, but it will certainly whip ungodly ass, I guarandamntee. But even more so, this doesn't really count. We ought to be comparing the games, not their projected fanbase lifespans.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
2,490
Best answers
0
Devion said:
Well I have one thing to says... Doom 3 will be a disater.

Why????

It needs a 3.0 ghz and a ati radeon 9800 pro and 1024 ddr ram to keep it going smooth on 800x600.

U says how can you know this?
They showed doom 3 @ e3 with this system O_O
They had this system to show doom 3 and some area the fps whent below the 20 fps.... -_-

Doom 3 will be way to heavy to run any normal comp.(normal comp 2 ghz with 256 ddr a 9000 radeon or a gf 4 ti)

:O i`m above the average gaming computer :)
Don't be an idiot. Even though Hsu has forbidden it, I'll tell you this much--I got 50 fps solid in the Alpha with 2.4ghz and a Radeon 9700 Pro. Besides that--do you honestly think they won't fix that? It's ****ing JOHN CARMACK. HE INVENTED 3D GAMES!!
 
Fumoffu!
Retired Forum Staff
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
2,888
Best answers
0
SaiyanPride:

When it comes down to my personal choice, if both are released along the same time - I'm eventually going to get both but I have to start with buying just one.

I remember the history just as much as you, I've been right there since wolf3d and doom and having lan parties for games which didn't even have multiplayer... Doom 3 is ofcourse being made by those very starters of the 3D-gaming age... BUT this is about my buying one at the begenning because I don't want to spend that much money on both at the same time. I would still choose HL2 because I do have a lot of things planned with HL2, from coding the SDK to popularizing my mod to the new Counter Strike to a lot of other stuff as well... I can wait a while for Doom 3 but, I am going to buy HL2 first.

And hey, this is just my opinion and decision - doesn't mean everyone is going to do that. ^_^
 
G-Bear
✔️ HL Verified
🚂 Steam Linked
Discord Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2002
Messages
764
Best answers
0
Sure SaiyanPrideXIX why does my friends brother who has a radeon 9800 pro and a 2.8 have 4 fps at some points.
And he does not has a pc full of junk.
And you say: Don`t be idiot...

Are you dumb orso?

@ e3 they`ll allready said u need a hell of a machine to run this game;

Atleast a 2.6 ghz.
The proper vidcard isn`t out for doom 3.(Cause they had some parts running lower then 20 fps)

Fix it? That will take them a another year.

And u also brag about; You forgot who invited 3d gaming, It's ****ing JOHN CARMACK. HE INVENTED 3D GAMES!!
Well doom wasn`t the first one.
Wolfenstein 3d was.....(Doom was only new with the multiplayer stuff :\
 
Lost in space
Banned
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Messages
17
Best answers
0
the doom 3 multiplayer demo runned on p4's with geforce fx5900 cards in 640x480,

doom 3 is gonna suck chit
 
New Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2003
Messages
409
Best answers
0
runned?

SaiyanPrideXIX took the words right out of my mouth. I have been a Doom fan all the way. No FPS, NONE, had the atmosphere of doom. Heck, I love HL, it was a landmark game, genius. But Doom was the father of the genre and brought an action and game play element that needed NO story. I wouldn't doubt that it will have an (at least) ok story, but you know, sometimes I just wanna blow stuff up, and do it with awesome game play and graphics. Street fighter is one of (if not the) greatest fighting games ever made. The story is lame at best. The of Doom is to have great game play and atmosphere, and because it always has, It was a landmark game. I'll probably end up with both.

Unless S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is too good. :)

can you say: HOLY SHNIKIES!
 
Senior Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 6, 2002
Messages
1,675
Best answers
0
Yokie said:
umm, hl was set in Black maysa(sp?), not a military compound.
Notice I said "like" ? Yeah, good.

Compairing doom too HL and saying its the same story wize for those reasons alone is laughable, im not even going to go into any lengh with telling you how dumb you looked.
Well.. please do, because right now that doesn't mean anything. You havn't proven me wrong and until you do I'll assume that you are the one making yourself appear foolish for posting without real reason.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
2,490
Best answers
0
Devion said:
Sure SaiyanPrideXIX why does my friends brother who has a radeon 9800 pro and a 2.8 have 4 fps at some points.
And he does not has a pc full of junk.
And you say: Don`t be idiot...

Are you dumb orso?

@ e3 they`ll allready said u need a hell of a machine to run this game;

Atleast a 2.6 ghz.
The proper vidcard isn`t out for doom 3.(Cause they had some parts running lower then 20 fps)

Fix it? That will take them a another year.

And u also brag about; You forgot who invited 3d gaming, It's ****ing JOHN CARMACK. HE INVENTED 3D GAMES!!
Well doom wasn`t the first one.
Wolfenstein 3d was.....(Doom was only new with the multiplayer stuff :\
Alright, let's assist you here, since obviously you don't know your history (like any of the blind CS/HL fanboys out there). First of all, CARMACK ALSO CREATED WOLFENSTEIN. So somebody is obviously miseducated.

Secondly, I was intelligent enough to know that the menus for the Doom alpha weren't complete, but yet, it's config files (which any Quake lover will know, are the files that your menu settings actually generate, and can be edited manually without a hitch) were all present. Therefore...while your friend was unable to tweak his settings to anything but utter maximum (as it was configured for E3)...I was able to tweak some effects and settings to a more reasonable level. It still looked bloody gorgeous--I have screens, if you'd like to see. In fact...here:

<IMG SRC="http://home.comcast.net/~rockerforcexv/hostedimages/doom4.jpg">

It was also built on Radeon technology..so...it never works the same for GeForce cards...the reason for it is simple enough. Read the news. GeForce cards are lame. They've been lying, and cheating, and in actuality can barely handle heavy use of directx 9 features in HL2, which is graphically similar to Doom, so you can do the math.

If your friend has a 9800 pro and DirectX 7.0, for instance, it can make the game not work. And if he has a 9800 pro and DX9, but only 128 megs of SD Ram, then it won't run right. And if he has a 9800 Pro that he threw up in a brand new shiny HP or Compaq, the onboard audio will screw it up. Not to mention interrupt requests, IRQ problems, etc. etc.

The simple fact is, it worked fine for me, not PHENOMENAL but a pretty solid 40fps. The chop was less than Unreal 2 had, in fact, and the graphics were vastly superior...as was the framerate. In fact, I had to run U2 at 800x600x16 with simple shading and lowered texture depth just to maintain playable framerate. But Doom ran well once I got done dipping into the settings and rigging it to suit my personal machine's nuances.

Saying that the proper videocard isn't out for Doom 3 is just ridiculous. Doom 3 is being built on machines with cards like mine and similar systems with similar specs, which have been far exceeded these days. Do you really think they could BUILD the game, but not RUN it?? Seriously....

Think before you speak next time, and maybe pick up a book once in a while so you can learn some of your personal history as a gamer and have a little faith and pride.
 
New Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2002
Messages
538
Best answers
0
In reference to your comment about the story-type and atmosphere of Half-life being an accidnet Saiyan Pride, I suggest you look up the author of that story. I think you will find he is a quite well known horror writer. There was no accident.

And yeah Devion, id Software also created Wolfenstein 3D.
 
Lost in space
Banned
Joined
Sep 25, 2003
Messages
0
Best answers
0
Well sorry mr. wise ass, not everyone can afford a ****in moster pc like you do. You know that 75% of the whole online multiplayer comunnity run pcs that have less than 1 ghz? Ever wondered why HL is still a great succes after five years? It's because everyone can run it and it still looks acceptable on faster systems.

Personnaly i think that an engine like the Chaser engine is much better than some 3d engine that can run cinematic graphics (like the Doom 3 and Unreal 2 engines). Because the Chaser engine looks very awesome on fast computers, but it also runs great on slow computers. Doom 3 will look even more awesome, but it will only run on monster pc's.

And saying that its gonna be good because its made by John Romero is just total bullsh1t. Remember Dikatana, the ever delayed game that was total crap when it finnaly came out? Besides that, he's a big fat fast food eatin' *******.

That nice lil' screenshot you posted there? No way in hell that's gonna run on a 1 Ghz pc with a TNT 2 card.

Anyone remembered the nice screenshots of the multiplayer test? The game runned on P4 3.06 GHZ systems with Geforce5900 FX Ultra cards (like the ones that smoke the Randeon 9800) and 2 gig ram. And they runned it in 640x480. Max players in multiplayer is 4. And that game is gonna beat HL 2 what runs on P3 systems with TNT cards? Don't make me laugh.

Doom 3 will be a demo of what the new Id engine is capable of. Nothing more, nothing less.
 
Moving with Sonic Speed
Retired Forum Staff
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
4,534
Best answers
0
I'm tired of people *****ing about how unfortunate they are computer wise. Go cry in a closet somewhere, I don't want to hear it anymore.

"My computer sucks so Doom 3 is a terrible game!"

Where is the logic there? Obviously they didn't design the game for you.

"I can't run the crappy alpha with a high framerate!"

That leaked alpha is about as optimized as it is complete. Wait for the finished product.

"Steam sucks because my computer is 8 years old!"

Upgrade.




The thread subject heading should be changed to start out "If you had a computer capable of running both games, ..." because otherwise we'll keep getting posts like these in here.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom