Lost in space
💻 Oldtimer
It's true, ps4 is very, very, slightly stronger but you won't be able to tell the differences in graphics or even in stability/performance. But I can tell you that Xbox will be running a lot of background processes while you play your halos and war gears and such. Still remains to be seen if that will affect the octa-core processor, but it is a fair point.
Tbh, the only series I really cared much about on Xbox was Halo and Gears of War. Gears of War lost me on number 3 and I just don't care about Halo enough to fund the growth towards always online requirements and the used game blocking.
Which is just retarded to begin with, honestly. You know how you get your new games to sell over the used? Incentive. The nintendo club rewards is a great way that Nintendo does it, and it works amazingly well. Using those rewards, you can get games on your console you can't get through the eshops. Problem solved there. But there's still a multitude of ways to get your money and Microsoft decided to go with the most douchebaggiest way. I still think they'll change it and, if they do, I may consider going to Xbone now that FFXV and KH3 are multi-platform.'
But, either way, both points are good. It's true that we should cater to ALL gamers equally, but the online functions can be groundbreaking as far as games go. Cloud computing is a great idea. It just needs to be optional on certain games. If we don't push the mold a bit, there won't be any progress and we can't simply cater to the low percentage if we want a much better system. It's the same with pc games, alot of games suffer simply because they try to make sure that the low end pc's can still play it.
Edit: Both, sure, when the consoles are below 250 dollars. Atm though, it'd be a grand to get them.
Tbh, the only series I really cared much about on Xbox was Halo and Gears of War. Gears of War lost me on number 3 and I just don't care about Halo enough to fund the growth towards always online requirements and the used game blocking.
Which is just retarded to begin with, honestly. You know how you get your new games to sell over the used? Incentive. The nintendo club rewards is a great way that Nintendo does it, and it works amazingly well. Using those rewards, you can get games on your console you can't get through the eshops. Problem solved there. But there's still a multitude of ways to get your money and Microsoft decided to go with the most douchebaggiest way. I still think they'll change it and, if they do, I may consider going to Xbone now that FFXV and KH3 are multi-platform.'
But, either way, both points are good. It's true that we should cater to ALL gamers equally, but the online functions can be groundbreaking as far as games go. Cloud computing is a great idea. It just needs to be optional on certain games. If we don't push the mold a bit, there won't be any progress and we can't simply cater to the low percentage if we want a much better system. It's the same with pc games, alot of games suffer simply because they try to make sure that the low end pc's can still play it.
Edit: Both, sure, when the consoles are below 250 dollars. Atm though, it'd be a grand to get them.
Last edited: