this is abstract artMrDomino said:Is there any meaning to what's going on here? I only ask because I'm not taking a whole lot away from it other than a bunch of repeated amorphous shapes. Meaning is very important to art, even more so when you present things as abstracts. I also don't quite see the point to the floating vector doodads all over the place in Godgate way, or the type choice.
From a techinical standpoint I suppose that they are well done. And compositionally they aren't bad. They just don't have any depth from what I can see.
You have no idea what that means do you? Does that then mean that anything that isn't drawn as a reproduction of life is abstact "art" then? What is that element that separates an actual piece of art from a splat on the ground? Because if abstract "art" has no meaning behind it there is no difference between the labor of an artist and the unguided scrawling of an infant. Do you honestly believe that all the founders and pioneers of abstract expressionism had no conceptual involvement in their work? That it was all completely accidental or aesthetic? That it had no meaning whatsoever beyond "that looks cool?"MinesSkylineR34 said:this is abstract art