I feel that's actually a very fitting description for it.ZeroNightmare said:"eating out the twins" where did you get that idea...
Well, let's see.. The only ones you heard make any noise were the twins, those specific 'motions' you had to make with the controller.. and they were the only ones without clothing. =PZeroNightmare said:i dont think a lamp would fall off the table next to the bed, and i dont think the bed would be banging against the wall.
they were boinking
Some may consider them to get some parent education . This is just the same thing as adults purchasing tobacco products or drinks for underaged persons.Jayster said:I have heard a v.similiar lawsuit.
Same deal, the mother/ grandmother bought GTA: SA for her son/ grandson only to find the game had sexual preferences... The article informed us the "kid" was under-age in the first place.
I'm sure this will look well in court!...
Mind-you, this is probably the same story?
Yes, they're exactly the same thing. Except for the fact that buying alcohol for underage kids is illegal and can cause you major fines of up to $200,000 and 1 year in jail. (In Ontario, this isn't a generalization.)Saiyan_Overlord said:This is just the same thing as adults purchasing tobacco products or drinks for underaged persons.
They knew about that back then ?SailorAlea said:Well, let's see.. The only ones you heard make any noise were the twins, those specific 'motions' you had to make with the controller.. and they were the only ones without clothing. =P
This post reminds me a bit like the other post where the dude kept bashing black guys, then said he had some black friends as if that nullified all the negative things he said. You're making generalisations of America that aren't necessarily true. Frivolous crap like this isn't only American, like A hospital where they banned "cooing" at babies because they are "little people with the same rights as me or you." So seriously, cut the "only in America" crap, everyone.Ashur said:Well WHAT is "peeep" Is that hey i see normal Americans... They dont act stupid but if your all so smart and understand that this is purly stupid? WHY does this horibly get rich quick skeem with the sueing continues?
We all think she isent that dumb... And she just wants to get money... She cant be that stupid...
BUT where is the justice when a woman like her can win? O_O
You know here where i live people who comeback from America say that you cant even compliment a woman on her good looks becous she can sue you on sexual arausal(I really think its something else) or whats that called...
Stuf like this scares the **** out of me ...(abouth coming to America) So thats probobly why i wont go there...
On the other hand there is NO country that is perfect...
(Dont you even dare to say i did a rasist comment or something insulting becous i had no intension )
obviously she KNEW that it had "sexualy explict content" and would be able to sue Rockstar. besides, given the chance wouldnt you want a extra 75K?Kasey said:Sweet! I'm gonna go sue for a bunch of money regaurdless of the information that I knew what the game was rated and that it says on the box why it is rated M. M standing for mature as in 17+ yet I bought it for my wittle baby waby. YAY! $75,000. You would think that the guy holding a gun on the front case woulda been a clue yet I'm just so arrogant that I didnt notice.. Oh well. SUE!!!!!!
And I dont even like those games. But its like saying. "I bought a porno for my kid and I'm sueing because it has sexual content in it."