um.......... windows xp service pack 2 is coming out within the month and supports 64 bit technology....opensource said:I would actually reccomend against getting a 64, but still go w/ an AMD. the 64 isnt supported by any current OS's, so you are wasting its processing capabilities, and can run into some compatibility issues.
i agreeXsilentlyXdiesX said:Simply AMD will always be better then Intel.
Intel Celeron is the afterbirth of a pentium 4.niobe said:no, i hate the whole amd prosessor.
it's way to slow and doesn't get close to intel celeron.
i only use intel, no slower prosessor.
I tottaly disagree with that.niobe said:no, i hate the whole amd prosessor.
it's way to slow and doesn't get close to intel celeron.
i only use intel, no slower prosessor.
Very true,XsilentlyXdiesX said:I tottaly disagree with that.
Either you got a old AMD processor or a bad one. Intel is built for the Office, AMD is built for games. AMD is faster then Intel and alot more convient.
Noes, get the 3200 for twice the l2 cache damnit.Jayster said:Very true,
i have desided to get myself a 64bit AMD Athlon 3000 now, seems to be a decent price as well ^^