I wish. I searched for it in the lost thread, but it wasn't there. I just googled bigfoot motocycle, it was like the third pic.Wtf, do you have that picture saved?
Uh.......no.They showed it on the news on one of my local tv stations, but that's not saying a lot.
But, if they are lying, wouldn't it be a reason for Fox to sue them?
The point in having it in a cooler is to keep the body from decomposing. If they took it out, threw it on a table or the ground, took a few pics, flipped it over, took a few more, and threw it back into the cooler, they'll have destroyed quite a bit of evidence. I'm still waiting for the results of the DNA analysis, but I can understand why, if it were real, they'd just leave it in there. The pictures don't matter. They can take a ****load of them later on, but they only really matter if it's proven to be legit.I've seen the picture and it looks pretty fake to me. And why the hell is there only one picture of it? If I found the loch ness monster I'd take more than one picture of it and it would be when it was layed out and not all cramped up in a cooler. I guess the costume they bought only had hands and a face that's why you cant see the rest. j/k. But it looks like it's just an ape or something with a decomposed mouth or lost its hair around its mouth or something. It could be real though. But if I saw bigfoot and there were more than one of them I'd probably try to capture a live one or kill one of them that wasn't decomposing.
I saw on some new website (fox news I think) that they had done DNA tests already and one of the tests came back inconclusive, one came back as human, and one as possum.It was taken off the front page of Drudge today.
This morning my wife heard that a preliminary DNA test detected Possum hair . . . this bodes poorly.