This is only my oppinion, so don't blow up about it. I've never been this direct about someone else's oppinion on these forums, but here we go:
That is arguably the absolute worst idea for an attack that I have heard anywhere on these forums, and comparable to the worst concepts for new weapons on the Urban Terror and Ns-Co forums.
An attack that drains your ****ing PL would leave YOU at a disadvantage and simply kill your opponents. They would respawn with more PL than you. This would make you more likely to fail in Power Struggles and it wouldn't change a thing as far as melee is concerned, so your opponents will just gang up on you again. If somebody final shrined me I would just respawn and start over with an even weaker opponent, and I know other people would too. They do. The ONLY people who would use this attack are ones who are either frustrated, or who don't care how low their PL drops and do it only to frustrate other people by blowing up over and over before they are kicked off of a server.
The ESF team wants new attacks but they don't want to get flamed by half of the community for adding an attack that is useless or too useful and frustrating. There are only 2 objectives in ESF DM and TDM: Increase your frags and increase your PL. This attack would take away a frag and decrease your PL. That's flawed logic. There's nothing fun about losing PL, and there's nothing fun about being taken out by a cheap ass attack designed to interupt melee.
I don't mean to come down on you like that, but I got tired of you quoting me and failing to clarify just why the hell I'm wrong. My oppinions are my own, and I'm sure there are poeple somewhere out there who think you should be on the ESF dev team for whatever reason and love your logic. I'm just tired of it. That's the way I think and it isn't going to change unless you can convince me that it isn't a stupid idea.