The end of everything on Earth, or the end of the Universe as a whole?RaVe said:woot My5tIcDrAg0n :/
Anyway to define the end of the world,if we sum it up into four words,it would be The end of everything
This is a commonly used argument, but as you hinted in your post, "and so has not been around for 'eternity,'" it assumes that our universe did indeed have a beginning. It is often convenient for humans to give things a start and finish, because these concepts are fundamentally entwined with our own finite existence. People find it difficult to "think outside the box" on such matters, and being a race so restricted by time this is hardly surprising. But we shouldn't allow these psychological limitations to lure us into possible false judgements about the universe.Orz said:I'm not assuming that we know everything, but if the universe has a birth, so too it has an end - that is the cycle of life that it imprints upon all of it's children.
Everything that begins must by definition have an end also. This is dangerous philosophical ground, but it has enough scientific background. If the universe truly was born, and so has not been around for 'eternity', then so too it must come to an end.
Heh, it's a shame that he died. The movie will almost certainly not live up to the books' standards without Doug at the Helm.Effigy said:i have all the books and the radio series.. god i want to meet douglas adams
I was stating what I believe. You don't have to challenge it, you know.Pain said:dont bring god into this.... that will get someone into an argument that no one can win, one person will say god doenst exist and someone else will say HAVE FAITH!!!.... yea all that bullcrap