Assassins Creed III

[macdaddymario]

When I was talking about SC, I was more so talking about the fact that, in games prior to Conviction, you COULD go through the entire game without once being forced into an 'action sequence', unlike AC where in even if you stealth your way into the most fortified of locations, they WILL force you to have to fight everyone on your way out.. which just shouldn't be the case. Like you said, it's an open world game, and because of that I should in theory have WAY more options then I did in SC or Hitman, but instead they force me to play one way or the other. That was my gripe.

 

[The Deco]

Most important, while this game ******* solve this Templar-Assassin feud ffs?

This game is so ******* long. I like to be able to play in the past and all, but I dont care less about the game's "present" plot. It is being dragged and touched very little in every game. I want to finish that arc already, they are supposed to save the world from the sun or something, so finish that ffs!

 

[hleV]

Most important, while this game ******* solve this Templar-Assassin feud ffs?

This game is so ******* long. I like to be able to play in the past and all, but I dont care less about the game's "present" plot. It is being dragged and touched very little in every game. I want to finish that arc already, they are supposed to save the world from the sun or something, so finish that ffs!

If they're gonna be releasing an AC every year, I'm doubtful that Desmond's story is gonna be finished anytime soon.

 

[The Deco]

releasing a game every year is a bad marketing tactic. people will be pissed off very quick, unless they do critical changes, like a full game in the present, or a future assassin creed game with lasers and shit

 

[pumadace2000]

releasing a game every year is a bad marketing tactic. people will be pissed off very quick, unless they do critical changes, like a full game in the present, or a future assassin creed game with lasers and shit

No one is pissed off by CODs yearly releases. And as far as I know the changes every new COD brings is worth dog-****, so no, chances are they are not gonna be ticked off.
Also problem: The "Past stories" can't work without the present ones.

Which means deal with it.

 

[Shadi]

Most important, while this game ******* solve this Templar-Assassin feud ffs?

This game is so ******* long. I like to be able to play in the past and all, but I dont care less about the game's "present" plot. It is being dragged and touched very little in every game. I want to finish that arc already, they are supposed to save the world from the sun or something, so finish that ffs!

Glad opinions are opinions.

Please just keep releasing it never gets old.

Also there are sneaky scenes but indeed not any where you can make it undetected out and in nearly :/

 

[Mkilbride]

http://fudzilla.com/home/item/27905-ac-3-pc-delay-rumors-now-confirmed

Delayed

Indefinitely.

We have been hearing a number of rumors that Ubisoft’s release of Assassin’s Creed 3 for the PC was going to be delayed beyond the expected release date after the arrival on the console system on October 30th.

The latest word now is that Ubisoft is planning for it to arrive at some point before Christmas, but they are not sure if they can make it, according to creative lead Alex Hutchinson who spoke about this during a panel discussion at Comic-Con.

PC version anyway.

 

[pumadace2000]

http://fudzilla.com/home/item/27905-ac-3-pc-delay-rumors-now-confirmed

Delayed

Indefinitely.

PC version anyway.

I mean really, how do you expect them to put all that DRM in it and release it at the same time with the console versions. A delay was strictly and vitally necessary.

So it may be released before Christmas? Splendid. Merry Christmas! Have this game and hope that a blizzard doesn't somehow shut down your internet, or else you can't play it!

 

[Damaera]

ITS COMING GUYS

 

[Deverz]

Still a whole month away

 

[hleV]

Nearly 2 months away for PC...

 

[Deverz]

Getting it on PS3, I prefer playing AC with a controller

 

[Mkilbride]

Uh, you realize you can play it on PC with a controller?

Better performance, better looking, as well, no real reason to get Console version unless you have a Supa Weak PC.

 

[Deverz]

I have a keyboard and mouse

Plus I've played all the others on PS3 anyway and my wife likes to watch. My PC area is too cramped/less comfortable for others watching

 

[Viper]

Uh, you realize you can play it on PC with a controller?

Better performance, better looking, as well, no real reason to get Console version unless you have a Supa Weak PC.

Except if it won't be properly ported to the PC. Like it happened for the Revelations multiplayer.

 

[Damaera]

Uh, you realize you can play it on PC with a controller?

Better performance, better looking, as well, no real reason to get Console version unless you have a Supa Weak PC.

There are more reasons to get a console version of a game than because of a "supa weak PC".

 

[hleV]

There are more reasons to get a console version of a game than because of a "supa weak PC".

I think Mkil meant that there's no reason to get a console for AC3.

 

[Mkilbride]

No, there's simply no reason to play it on Console.

PC can hook up to TV's, PC can use controller.

If you don't have a Supa Weak PC, I can see no reason, other than you're dumb, not to play AC3 on it.

 

[Viper]

No, there's simply no reason to play it on Console.

PC can hook up to TV's, PC can use controller.

If you don't have a Supa Weak PC, I can see no reason, other than you're dumb, not to play AC3 on it.

Again, there is one big problem with the PC versions: The porting job might not be done properly. AKA suck.

 

[The Deco]

Again, there is one big problem with the PC versions: The porting job might not be done properly. AKA suck.

I enjoyed every single game of AC on pc.