I see what you did there. And it's a fair point, I agree. Maybe I should have worded it a tad bit differently. In it's purest form, or better yet,
intention religion probably isn't bad, when you ignore the stoning of your neighbors and stuff. But you add people to the mix. Religion offers power, power corrupts. People corrupt. Anyway I just want to bounce a little something back to you though. It's about the abuse and perversion of religion. I'd like to talk about when that started. Before.. or after the bible was written. Wouldn't you think the bible is a product of said abuse and perversion? How it was written centuries after certain situations happened. How "facts" were changed in order to improve the perception of people.
Yes, without religion humans can be horrible too. But I don't see how that is a defense for religion. In my eyes, it seems like all it's been is a group of people, who want power and money to increase their influence in the world. Just like any other cooperation out there, but with tax breaks.
And this isn't something that slipped in later, no this was the intention from the start. Control human beings, through fear(of death) and salvation. Which gives me just another reason to doubt it all.
PS. Sorry for the harsh words.
I am honestly a bit divided here, because it's always you versus the rest, and words can hit hard. Just remember that it may at times seem a bit more harsh then originally intended.. in my case anyway.