New Member
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2003
- Messages
- 654
- Best answers
- 0
Well, I honestly want to say Torque is better...only because I haven't seen it.
I know you said F&F was about fast action car scenes groov, but they aren't even realistic. Take 2 Fast 2 ****ty...a car ramps off of nothing 50ft out into a lake onto a boat...and nothing ignites for an explosion...no gas leaks anything like that...I find that repugnant, if you're gonna give me action, give me explosions
But anyways I can't imagine anything being worse than the fast and furious duo, even if it is a carbon copy of them, it had to do something better...at least the fact that they don't have paul walker's terrible acting and that black dude in the second one, he should stick with his modeling career cuz i wanted to vomit whenever he opened his mouf
so yeah...
I know you said F&F was about fast action car scenes groov, but they aren't even realistic. Take 2 Fast 2 ****ty...a car ramps off of nothing 50ft out into a lake onto a boat...and nothing ignites for an explosion...no gas leaks anything like that...I find that repugnant, if you're gonna give me action, give me explosions
But anyways I can't imagine anything being worse than the fast and furious duo, even if it is a carbon copy of them, it had to do something better...at least the fact that they don't have paul walker's terrible acting and that black dude in the second one, he should stick with his modeling career cuz i wanted to vomit whenever he opened his mouf
so yeah...