Lost in space
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2003
- Messages
- 814
- Best answers
- 0
http://www.joystiq.com/2006/08/24/blizzard-major-project-announcement-in-2007/
O_O
/me dies of permanent erection
O_O
/me dies of permanent erection
yes bapple.... YESbapplebo said:OH MY GOD!!
<blink>o/</blink>
Don't use the <blink> tag, lol. It's so deprecated.bapplebo said:OH MY GOD!!
<blink>o/</blink>
Oh, don't get me wrong.. The Warcraft series are good fun.. I still play WC3 like everyday with some buds.. I used to be a die hard WoW fan as well.. Untill they started screwing around with the Lore (first noticable with the release of AQ).. Now with the additional races and features in the Burning Crusade, they're assassinating the Warcraft Lore, the one thing that made Warcraft so damn fun.. Blizzard used to be Gods when it came to balancing games (reference: Warcraft 3.. That one has to be one of the best balanced games ever), but in WoW, they're just following the mainstream opinions of raidhungry people that don't care about the Lore or Warcraft overall (or even logic for that matter).. I know lots of people that still play the game for fun etc, but they gave up on the background story, the Lore.. The spine of the game..SaiyanPrideXIX said:...you mean gave us an awesome endless game that has expanded the lore and set a new standard for MMORPGs and Fantasy genre games alike? I don't know what you're talking about, man. I haven't seen like, one single negative thing going on with Warcraft.
Starcraft on the other hand, I always considered to unbalanced to find fun. Hopefully for me at least, Starcraft 2 will have the brains involved that War3 did but with more units per group to give it that 'swarming' feel.
OMG *stabs you*Jehuty187 said:I hope they add a hero system to it, like WC3 does.
It's kinda hard for me to not like the game when I can't play it, heh.SaiyanPrideXIX said:I usually only hear that from people who's computers couldn't run Warcraft 3, heh.