New Member
💻 Oldtimer
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2004
- Messages
- 5,216
- Best answers
- 0
I know the ESF team have got a whole new system for 1.3 in place whereby you're invinicble on the first transformation and after that you're killable, and as far as I know it's still in play, but I would request that this thread is kept open for discussion.
My idea is simple, it provides a solution to solve transkilling, while at the same time isn't whoreable (unless you can read your opponents mind).
Simply, if a move has begun its charge before the other player begins transforming then the transformer takes regular damage from the attack.
If a move has begun it's charge while the other player is transforming, the transformer takes no damage.
E.G:
-Player 2 Charges a Kamehameha (first)
-Player 1 Begins to Transform
-Player 2 Fires The Kamehameha
-Player 1 Takes regular damage.
-Player 1 Starts Transforming (first)
-Player 2 Charges a Kamehameha
-Player 1 is Transforming
-Player 2 Fires the Kamehameha
-Player 1 Takes no Damage and completes transformation
Because of this, people can transform when they want without being transkilled, but at the same time can't use transforming as a defence mechanism. C+C?
My idea is simple, it provides a solution to solve transkilling, while at the same time isn't whoreable (unless you can read your opponents mind).
Simply, if a move has begun its charge before the other player begins transforming then the transformer takes regular damage from the attack.
If a move has begun it's charge while the other player is transforming, the transformer takes no damage.
E.G:
-Player 2 Charges a Kamehameha (first)
-Player 1 Begins to Transform
-Player 2 Fires The Kamehameha
-Player 1 Takes regular damage.
-Player 1 Starts Transforming (first)
-Player 2 Charges a Kamehameha
-Player 1 is Transforming
-Player 2 Fires the Kamehameha
-Player 1 Takes no Damage and completes transformation
Because of this, people can transform when they want without being transkilled, but at the same time can't use transforming as a defence mechanism. C+C?