Asian and European people are always well-known for their skills and knowledge in designing weapons.
And like in WW2, there were always weapons designed to take care of a specific job.
Knights were basicly the living tanks on the battlefield, while Samurai's are tanks with speed and firepower.
Most of the essay is reasonable, but still, if you think about.
A heavy knight vs a disciplined, highly trained, weakness exploiting etc Samurai.
It'll be a matter of time that the Knight will kiss the floor's dust.
Just think about it, the Knight attacks with his sword, the Samurai will easily block or counter it with his fast blade.
At the other hand, a knight is very deadly while he is mounted on a horse. But again, this can be countered.
There is only one logical weakness of both Knights.
And that's the GUN.
Ninja's vs Guns = Effective.
Guns vs Knights = Effective
:laff:
Ak-47 are great at medium and short range fighting. While a m16 can suit all needs of a soldier.
And Dakilla, they'll kill you with a sword if they are close enough to you.
No phool runs afta a guy with a gun ya know, people with swords just outsmarts and kills you before yo can blink orh turn around.