Moving with Sonic Speed
Retired Forum Staff
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2003
- Messages
- 4,534
- Best answers
- 0
Well I had an extremely long response to Cuc but the forum ate it when I tried to send it so, so much for that.
I'll summarize, real fast and dirty.
Cuc, it isn't like we don't know most users are still on dial up, it's that they're a dwindling majority. Relatively quickly broadband is going to take narrow band's place as the most frequently carried connection used in online games. Not too long after that it will likely take over as the vast majority of connected gamers and then this outcrying will die down.
Broadband isn't all that expensive anymore. For 20 bucks you can hook yourself up with some basic DSL. For 30 bucks you can hook yourself up with some faster DSL or basic cable (model excluded). If you take out 10 dollars a month for a 56k connection and possibly much more for a second phoneline (if that's the route you took) it is not a huge jump in price. Broadband users are unhappy about seeing the progress of online games be retarded by 33.6 and 56k users and they get excited about applications that are designed to take advantage of their connection speed. Now I know not everybody can get broadband where they live, but they are a fairly small minority, and that will not be as true over the next few years and broadband continues to take off.
56k and ISDN are great, but Broadband has a lot more potential for its users, and if you factor in the fact that the majority of broadband users are capitalists then you can understand that you get what you pay for. Want to pay 10 dollars for 56k? Get 10 dollars worth of service. You can still play, but you're going to have to upgrade to gain access to all of the features you want.
It isn't an issue of wanting 56kers to go away, it's that we want to get what we pay for, and we've paid for a faster connection that we want to see more use made of. Programs like Steam can offer that up to us in exchange for pissing on a few 33.6k users who will have all the difficulty in the world trying to update games and the like due to the bandwidth requirements of Steam. I feel bad about those slower users, but I also think it's about time somebody designed a program that caters to broadband users without spending all of their time worrying about how slower modems will handle the load.
I'll summarize, real fast and dirty.
Cuc, it isn't like we don't know most users are still on dial up, it's that they're a dwindling majority. Relatively quickly broadband is going to take narrow band's place as the most frequently carried connection used in online games. Not too long after that it will likely take over as the vast majority of connected gamers and then this outcrying will die down.
Broadband isn't all that expensive anymore. For 20 bucks you can hook yourself up with some basic DSL. For 30 bucks you can hook yourself up with some faster DSL or basic cable (model excluded). If you take out 10 dollars a month for a 56k connection and possibly much more for a second phoneline (if that's the route you took) it is not a huge jump in price. Broadband users are unhappy about seeing the progress of online games be retarded by 33.6 and 56k users and they get excited about applications that are designed to take advantage of their connection speed. Now I know not everybody can get broadband where they live, but they are a fairly small minority, and that will not be as true over the next few years and broadband continues to take off.
56k and ISDN are great, but Broadband has a lot more potential for its users, and if you factor in the fact that the majority of broadband users are capitalists then you can understand that you get what you pay for. Want to pay 10 dollars for 56k? Get 10 dollars worth of service. You can still play, but you're going to have to upgrade to gain access to all of the features you want.
It isn't an issue of wanting 56kers to go away, it's that we want to get what we pay for, and we've paid for a faster connection that we want to see more use made of. Programs like Steam can offer that up to us in exchange for pissing on a few 33.6k users who will have all the difficulty in the world trying to update games and the like due to the bandwidth requirements of Steam. I feel bad about those slower users, but I also think it's about time somebody designed a program that caters to broadband users without spending all of their time worrying about how slower modems will handle the load.