Saiga said:
I based it on the fact that the sigs have a 'watered-down' colour, IE: weak. The 'foggy' top brush layer, the font and font placement, also the non-blended stock. It just looks like Dask's old style.
i sorta agree on the second one, the first one isnt really like anyones, imo. Dask's old style is a lil different than that.
The first one i dont really like
there are some areas where it is sharp contrast between light and dark but they are misplaced and lack composition, and it doesnt fit with the way u blended the image, its not far off from being nice though, i think you need to add a bit of variation in the background with subtle brushes, i'd suggest using the colour of the guys hair in the stock u used (the highlighted part not the dark) and use the brush on a few different blending options, im not sure but thats what i'd do. i'd give it a 5.5/10 atm not bad but i think there is needless highlights in the background and other reasons ive stated.
The second i like a lot >< i think its good and i think the stock is perfect, i'd just make the light coloured brushing a bit brighter, not much but eh its just a personal taste really. if u made the dark colours a tad bit darker it would add sum depth into it as well. I'd give it 8/10
sorry just feel in a really artsy mood.... meh likes closely looking at artwork and deciding what i do and dont like :fight: