Red Alert 3

Base belongs to me.
👑 Administrator
🌠 Staff
✔️ HL Verified
🚂 Steam Linked
💎Légéñdārý
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
10,867
Best answers
0
Location
Netherlands
<img src="http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e330/Zycban/GoT/RA3/RA3Banner.png"</img>​


Red Alert 3, who's going to get it? I've been waiting for this game for quite a while now. While the game is good, it has its flaws. For example, all units / buildings can be easily destroyed by a few strong units or a group of weak ones. I'm not sure if they did this to decrease the time played on a single map, but I don't really like it.

The second thing is that I don't like if that if you tech upgrade yourself to build more units, it will only effect all in the same building group. Now, you may get confused. But when you build your first contruction yard (which has been set in place already in the beginning), it'll display as #1 <-- building number one tab. When you deploy a building for you to create units such as tanks for the first time, that will also display as #1 building tab. If you build multiple, those will display as #2, #3, and so on. You can switch tabs and select of which building you wish to create units. Now, if you upgraded your units at your first contruction yard, it will only effect all buildings of the same group that your contruction yard is in.

In this case, all first buildings (#1) will have new units on all your #1 buildings. If you do it with your second construction yard, you'll have your new units only on all your #2 buildings. So, for example your construction yard gets destroyed and a few of your unit buildings. You have to rebuild the contruction yard (with an MCV), upgrade your units and then you can build advanced units... Kinda crappy if you ask me.

For those who really don't understand:
Construction Yard #1 Unit Upgrades --> Will not effect on your second, third, etc unit buildings. Not unless you create a second or third construction yard (which matches up the building number tab of the unit buildings) upgrade the skills again.



Preview Images (ingame):






 
Last edited:
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
1,285
Best answers
0
Location
Finland
I'm definitely getting it.

However, in my opinion , Command and Conquer series lost it's shine after Tiberian Sun ( can't deny that RA2 wasn't good either ).
C&C 3 was a major disappointment ( which is a shame, because I've always prefered the tiberium universe ), so I really do hope this is going to be good .
 
Active Member
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
3,055
Best answers
0
Location
Round Rock, TX
Those screens look kinda cool. I might get it. RA2 was entertaining. Never been a huge C&C fan though.
 
Pwns Mastasurf at TF2
Retired Forum Staff
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 7, 2001
Messages
5,115
Best answers
0
I'll prolly pick it up eventually. It better not be as ****ing buggy as C&C3 was. Damn thing crashed all the time and they never fixed those bugs. T7700 Core 2 duo, 256mb GEfore 8600m GT, 3 gigs of ram, there's no reason things should be crashing...
 
whereswarren (King_Vegeta)
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jun 6, 2004
Messages
2,275
Best answers
0
Won't be no starcraft2 but I might check it out, seems like it'll be fun.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom