New Member
💻 Oldtimer
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2002
- Messages
- 1,495
- Best answers
- 0
All opinions, I think MGS controls are fine, and I'll argue with you all day about which system has the better games coming out. However, it's a FACT that the PS3 is the best bang for your buck. So we can argue all day about controls, and what games are good, but when it comes down to it the 360 is inferior technology. While I really don't care which system has better graphics (which is easily the PS3, and anyone that denies it is delusional, seriously, the only xbox game that competes with PS3's graphics is Gears of War), I feel that the PS3's Library will be far superior to the Xbox's. This is debatable, i know, but that's my point.Actually, I could care less, to be honest. The Xbox has much better games coming out. The days when MGS was the only game with that level of polish are long gone.
And besides the fact, Kojima has the worst controls in ten years. I can't imagine the horrible things that are gonna be implemented over sixaxis...
That's one thing I like about the 360. No gimmick. It's just...good.
There is no game out on the 360 yet that has MGS's level of polish, you obviously haven't played the game. Even Gears of War, the current trophy-game of the 360 doesn't hold a candle to MGS 3. Graphics are one thing, but MGS has much more gameplay depth than GOW.
By the way, the sixaxis is not a gimmick, it's rarley mentioned, there is really only one game that features it as more than an extra feature and it's warhawk. The flying in warhawk isn't even half of the game, so I wouldn't even consider that. It's just another extra thing that you can play around with if you want to. Now, the Wii motion sensing... that's a gimmick. That's pretty much what nintendo is riding on. That and the nintendo games that are going to be re-hashed thousands of times (Allthough I love those games don't get me wrong, it's just lack of originality in games from nintendo).