new sig critz please

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
27
Best answers
0
<img src="http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2003-10/443125/sig.jpg" width=600 height=200>
 

Eon

TeeHee
Banned
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
5,341
Best answers
0
Pics seemed smushed/stretched and a little low quality, pic on the far right needs help with the cutout =X
 
Retired
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Messages
0
Best answers
0
I wouldnt make a signature that huge, I would shrink it to around 400x100? (my current sig). huge sigs dont look very good most of the time. + its pretty bad quality. but yeah what Magus said, the proportions arent right, try to link the width and height of a pic when you resize it.
 
New Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2003
Messages
155
Best answers
0
Dont you think its pretty huge to be a Sig? Also some of the pictures are poorly cutout.. :S
 
New Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Messages
266
Best answers
0
For a n00b-give it nice 8/10
For a normal/pro give it 3.5/10
Bad cutout,background that looks awful,andddd.........Ah,yes,its too big,and I think u reached 600x200...resize definently.....pretty good for beginer/n00b...
 
New Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2003
Messages
155
Best answers
0
Uh, looks like the same one from the last post you made. Or is it just me? :S
 

owa

New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 26, 2002
Messages
1,043
Best answers
0
No it isn't the same >:+][

It is better, the size fits, and the images are atleast semi decent cut-out.

I'll give you a 10/10, I think you'll eventually become better, but work on blending/cutting/image location/and a little less n00bish backgrounds.
 
New Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2003
Messages
155
Best answers
0
Wait nevermind, I was just too slow to catch on to it.. rofl. Nice. Keep up the good work.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top