✔️ HL Verified
- Jun 17, 2003
- Best answers
Not anything to discuss about... but man it really sucked. o_o. I perfer the old one better. Your opinions?
Really? Alot of peolple said it was a remake. I myself thought it was a remake when looking at the commercials. I really can not wait to see the movie, as I do hope what you say is true.SailorAlea said:A lot of people said it was good--and much better than the original. It's a darker take on the story--one much closer to the book.
If you're judging the new one as a "remake" of the first movie, your opinion is worthless.
Ah! Ok thank you for clearing that up. I think the book was awesome, so I can not wait to see the movie.Half-Unit said:Bad News Bears isn't really a remake either. I think it's actually a sequel to Bad Santa, but under the name 'Bad News Bears", it's a remake. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a remake, maybe not direct, but a remake nonetheless. Drawing comparisons between the two movies is natural, and to say that it makes ones opinion worthless is an invalid statement and somewhat contradicting considering what you said: "A lot of people said it was good--and much better than the original."
KidBoy, it's a remake in a loose sense. It's based on the book more than the first movie, but it's still a remake.
It was too childish for me, hardly any special effects, and if you guys are going to see it in the theatres, I would wait for the DVD....Fatal_CobraX said:It's out!? (search's on some random BT site)
Why was it so bad? Explain??