~Gurbir~
🌈 Beta Tester
★ Black Lounger ★
✔️ HL Verified
Oh no, they do.Wait... What about wireless sex....?
Darn people. They don't understand whats good for them.
Yeah, too bad solar panels cost such an assload of money...man, if they could make them cost effective then EVERYONE could have them on their roof! But noooooo, they have to be worth thousands of dollars, so nobody buys them. If I could afford them, I'd have solar panels mounted over the whole roof. There's no downside to them, except they're so expensive...I could see this being useful if people used solar energy more.
Let's imagine everyone had solar panels on their roof, then you could get more energy, so the 40% efficiency wouldn't be as much of a bother since it's free electricity anyway.
Nah, that thread you're talking abou was powering up devices by placing them on a metal plateish thing. No wires in that one, but this is far more convenient.thats old news btw. there has been a thread about this (exact same method btw) about 1 or 2 years ago or so.
Anyway, I wouldn't want to use it. 40% efficiency over only 2 meters? Who's gonna pay my power bill then.
As if we hadn't enough energy problems already...
No... i remember that exact same thread also. It used the exact same method that was used here, if i remember correctly.Nah, that thread you're talking abou was powering up devices by placing them on a metal plateish thing. No wires in that one, but this is far more convenient.
And they actually dont make enough energy so you could compensate for the lost 60%. You probably couldnt keep more than few energy saving lightbulbs if you had a roof full of them on a cloudless day. Solar energy isnt that efficient.There's no downside to them, except they're so expensive...