New Member
💻 Oldtimer
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2005
- Messages
- 1,030
- Best answers
- 0
Time to activate Deep Freeze again.
Bahahahaha!i believe the courts considder it the same as stealing a mans tools, which is worse than murder
Somehow I can't picture Adobe losing the slightest bit of money at all because little Joe Makes-his-own-sigs illegally downloads their program. It's not a case where they are pirating it to not have to buy it, or even pirating so they can try before they go out and buy it, it's a case where they are pirating it because they simply cannot afford to buy it, and doing so would be unjustified and stupid.Sandstorm said:I don't care what you say, there is no way to justify piracy.
I have also smoked marijuana, I download guitar tabs rather than buying books of them, and I've photocopied pages from a textbook because I didn't want to pay twice as much for the "new" edition with everything the same except different questions, yet somehow I don't live in fear that the RCMP is going to come bust down my door and haul me off to jail for it.There are 150,000 reasons to not pirate software -- cause that's what you risk paying. There are 20 reasons not to distribute pirated software -- the number of years you'll spend behind bars.
lol on deep freeze i have mirc installed and still have the same 30 day trile hehe i have the mirc about 2 or 3 mounthsTime to activate Deep Freeze again.
The high road? On the internet? I tip my hat.Rather than bash this horse back and forth, I'm going to need to end this conversation with an agreement to disagree. We've strayed from the topic of the price of Software (which is, admittedly, ridiculous for commercial software).
I once looked at the price of Maya, and I saw a price tag of about $12,000... Just because you offer the best software on the market doesn't mean you should go all Dr Dip**** about it and put a $12,000 price tag or even a $1,200 price tag on it.
Believe me David, I see things from both angles of the argument. I'm not the pro-industry fiend I appear to be. I look at all topics from both sides. I just don't like absolutes (ie- only one side of the argument gets to say something).
If I released a 3d modeling package tomorrow, would I be asking $500? Chances are 99.99% in favour of no. Maybe $100 per license, but, while I can't justify stealing a $2500 program, I also can't justify charging $2500 for software.