New Member
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2006
- Messages
- 515
- Best answers
- 0
Stop ignoring the fact that they are a 100% perfect match with the original reference pictures.. You even took over the edges of the reference pictures where the lines stopped (really noticable on Broli and Gogeta).. Your drawing and the original pictures aren't even resized, they're the same size!
Really, you might fool a few clueless people, but I've been working and studying graphical and digital arts for 9 years now, I've seen lots of stuff including rips and traces.. Your first 3 drawings are obviously a trace, ask any real drawingartist and they will all confirm what I've been saying here.. Those drawings of you are traced, period.
I do believe, however, that you drew that Naruto, because quite frankly, it lacks quality, anatomy and overall graphical knowledge.. It's not bad (better than some stuff posted around here), but it lacks the same quality of the other (traced) drawings you posted, thus showing again that the first 3 are traced, because those 3 were near perfect, and this Naruto just isn't.
Really, you might fool a few clueless people, but I've been working and studying graphical and digital arts for 9 years now, I've seen lots of stuff including rips and traces.. Your first 3 drawings are obviously a trace, ask any real drawingartist and they will all confirm what I've been saying here.. Those drawings of you are traced, period.
I do believe, however, that you drew that Naruto, because quite frankly, it lacks quality, anatomy and overall graphical knowledge.. It's not bad (better than some stuff posted around here), but it lacks the same quality of the other (traced) drawings you posted, thus showing again that the first 3 are traced, because those 3 were near perfect, and this Naruto just isn't.