Immortality is Just Around the Corner

Cunning as Zeus
Banned
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
6,079
Best answers
0
Scientists have stopped the ageing process in an entire organ for the first time, a study released today says.


Published in today's online edition of Nature Medicine, researchers at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Yeshiva University in New York City also say the older organs function as well as they did when the host animal was younger.


The researchers, led by Associate Professor Ana Maria Cuervo, blocked the ageing process in mice livers by stopping the build-up of harmful proteins inside the organ's cells.


As people age their cells become less efficient at getting rid of damaged protein resulting in a build-up of toxic material that is especially pronounced in Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and other neurodegenerative disorders.


The researchers say the findings suggest that therapies for boosting protein clearance might help stave off some of the declines in function that accompanies old age.


In experiments, livers in genetically modified mice 22 to 26 months old, the equivalent of octogenarians in human years, cleaned blood as efficiently as those in animals a quarter their age.


By contrast, the livers of normal mice in a control group began to fail.
The benefits of restoring the cleaning mechanisms found inside all cells could extend far beyond a single organ, says Cuervo.


"Our findings are particularly relevant for neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's," she says.
'Misbehaving proteins'

"Many of these diseases are due to 'misbehaving' or damaged proteins that accumulate in neurons. By preventing this decline in protein clearance, we may be able to keep these people free of symptoms for a longer time."


If the body's ability to dispose of cell debris within the cell were enhanced across a wider range of tissues, she says, it could extend life as well.


In healthy organisms, a surveillance system inside cells called chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA) locates, digests and destroys damaged proteins.


Specialised molecules, the "chaperones", ferry the harmful material to membrane-bound sacs of enzymes within the cells known as lysosomes.


Once the cargo has been "docked", a receptor molecule transfers the protein into the sac, where it is rapidly digested.


With age, these receptors stop working as well, resulting in a dangerous build-up of faulty proteins that has been linked, in the liver, to insulin resistance as well as the inability to metabolise sugar, fats or alcohol.


The same breakdown of the cell's cleaning machinery can also impair the liver's ability to remove the toxic build-up of drugs at a stage in life when medication is often part of daily diet.


In genetically modified mice, Cuervo compensated for the loss of the receptors in the animals by adding extra copies.


"That was enough to maintain a clean liver and to prove that if you keep your cells clean they work better," she says.
Settles debate

The study goes a long way towards settling a sharp debate in the field of ageing research.


Leading Australian ageing researcher David le Couteur, Professor of Geriatric Medicine at the University of Sydney, says the paper is a major breakthrough.


"She has single-handedly shown that lysosome function is a crucial part of the ageing process," he says.


Cuervo has also shown, he says, the critical role the lysosomal receptor molecules play in keeping the liver clean of damaged proteins.
While her paper does not show increased survival rates among the mice, le

Couteur, who has advised her recently on the research, says Cuervo does have data on improved survival rates which she intends to publish.


He also says she is now working with pharmaceutical companies to identify drugs that will turn the receptors on, or make them more active.
Cuervo believes maintaining efficient protein clearance may improve longevity and function in all the body's tissues.


It is also possible that the same kind of "cellular clearance" can be achieved through diet, she says.


Research over the past decade has shown that restricted calorie intake in animals, including mammals, significantly enhances longevity.


"My ideal intervention in the future would be a better diet rather than a pill," she says.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2008/08/11/2331197.htm?site=science&topic=latest
 
Active Member
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Oct 27, 2004
Messages
2,462
Best answers
0
Haha, for uses like curing disease, this looks awesome. But let's say was actually able to significantly extend the human lifespan. Like, by 100 years. Overpopulation could become as serious problem, at least in some areas.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 13, 2003
Messages
2,904
Best answers
0
That's why we need to terraform Mars as soon as possible.
 
Cunning as Zeus
Banned
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
6,079
Best answers
0
Haha, for uses like curing disease, this looks awesome. But let's say was actually able to significantly extend the human lifespan. Like, by 100 years. Overpopulation could become as serious problem, at least in some areas.
It isn't like we're going to go to countries where everyone is starving to death and desperately need to have children in order to keep the continent populated and give them this tech. It'd be a waste on multiple levels. If this technology were used at all, you'd have to pay an exorbitant amount of money, and would really only be available in the developed world.
 
Cunning as Zeus
Banned
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
6,079
Best answers
0
Force Pit Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
495
Best answers
0
I'd love to increase my lifespan by a nice 100 years or so. Assuming I won't be 150 with all these problems and needing machines and medicine to keep me alive.
 
The Duke of Juke
Retired Forum Staff
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,852
Best answers
0
Yay, but would you really want to life forever?
It's not like you wouldn't have the option of eventually offing yourself if you grew bored with life.

Granted we'll probably have to find prevention/a cure for cancer to go hand in hand with this.
 
New Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2008
Messages
63
Best answers
0
Not forever, just until i decided i was ready to die lol :D
 
Member
✔️ HL Verified
🍂 Regular
Joined
Sep 21, 2005
Messages
146
Best answers
0
Well, you can think of it this way. If you stop aging under the age of 18, well, that's alot more pu$$y for you, Mr.
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,386
Best answers
0
Location
Serbia ex Yugoslavia
Nix, I don't think you would like to live forever. I don't think anyone would. Living forever doesn't mean you stay young forever. Imagine your self old and in pain or even in wheelchairs waiting for your end with smile on your face. But iy won't happen : S.
 
New Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2004
Messages
397
Best answers
0
Actually the kind of 'immortality' the article is talking about DOES mean you stay young forever, heck look at the first line of the article.

Although i thought your body didn't regenerate brain cells so once those started to get low you're screwed no matter what. it's been a long time since i took biology though so that could be completely wrong.
 
New Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2005
Messages
603
Best answers
0
Location
Lithuania
The balance on earth would get screwed up if our lifespan increased to at least 200 years. Not to mention that life forever is extremely retarded.
It's a great achievement yes, but instead they could've searched for ways to cure different diseases. Living a 100 years is fairly enough.
 

guest

G
Guest
It isn't like we're going to go to countries where everyone is starving to death and desperately need to have children in order to keep the continent populated and give them this tech. It'd be a waste on multiple levels. If this technology were used at all, you'd have to pay an exorbitant amount of money, and would really only be available in the developed world.
Oh Christ so all the rich idiots in charge are going to live 100 years longer than me?
That's ****ing ridiculous. Unless it can cure cancer, I see no point in this technology. No-one needs to live 200 years. If you really want to live 200 years, you fear death too much and are trying to cheat it.
 
Now with Kung-Fu action!
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 13, 2004
Messages
1,761
Best answers
0
Location
England
I don't want to live for that long, imagine how much birthday candles will cost! Kids kicking their toys onto my lawn and then their kids doing the same.

Immortality sounds lovely but I really don't want it. I'll start missing the good old days and they'll make the retirement age 100 or something.
 
Cunning as Zeus
Banned
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
6,079
Best answers
0
I still wouldn't mind living forever. It has more to do with an insatiable curiosity than fear of death (because I'm not afraid in the least).
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
1,547
Best answers
0
Location
Johannesburg, South Africa
You'll outlive your whole family, might get lonely after a while, yeah you probably do make new friends and stuff but still.

Imagine how difficult it would be to keep up with technology if you're 200, unless they find a way to keep your brain active and healthy, it doesn't help having a body in great shape but with the mind of an old fart, you'll forget things in a matter of seconds I think, or am I wrong?
 
Cunning as Zeus
Banned
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 23, 2003
Messages
6,079
Best answers
0
Yeah, you're wrong. They wouldn't forget about the most important part of your body.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom