first sig

New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
26
Best answers
0
well here is my first sig tell me what you think
 
Active Member
💻 Oldtimer
✔️ HL Verified
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
3,055
Best answers
0
The shadow on the text wasn't necessary. The background color doesn't match the render or the glow. Also, if my eyes don't deceive me, it doesn't have a border. So I've got no choice but to give it a 3/10.

But it's not bad for being your first sig, trust me. Just keep practicing, and everything will start to come natural.
 
New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
890
Best answers
0
Well like Spunky already said, it needs brighter background and border. And i would also recommend decreasing the glow around the render, thats a little too much... i too will give it 3/10...
 
New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
26
Best answers
0
here how about this stuff

*fixed the brightness border no more glow*

<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/8735/taran33tf9.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>


or how about this one

<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/9749/taran44sn9.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>
 
Mr. Preacher
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 7, 2002
Messages
1,344
Best answers
0
*Moved to the Signatures Section*

Next time please post in the correct section.
 
New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2005
Messages
890
Best answers
0
Taran said:
here how about this stuff

*fixed the brightness border no more glow*

<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/8735/taran33tf9.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>
That's a lot better than the first one! But the border doesnt have to be 2 pixels wide, 1 pixel wide border is enough. It's still at least twice better than the old one. 6/10!

Taran said:
or how about this one

<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/9749/taran44sn9.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>
The render is blurry you cant even tell which way he is looking at...
The other one was better on my opinion. 5/10

And both your sigs have this gap between the rightmost side and border.
 

jp

New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
1,561
Best answers
0
Let me give you some advice,

Don't ever squeeze a picture for in your signature, never, its just not pretty when you do that, just resize it without squeezing it, and you'll do fine.
 
Active Member
💻 Oldtimer
✔️ HL Verified
Joined
Nov 6, 2004
Messages
3,055
Best answers
0
Taran said:
or how about this one

[advice]Hold CTRL+ALT+SHIFT when resizing you render (Assuming you're using Photoshop) to keep the aspect ratio of the render.[/advice]
 
New Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
26
Best answers
0
<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img159.imageshack.us/img159/186/taran433ns1.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
3,746
Best answers
0
Taran said:
<a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img159.imageshack.us/img159/186/taran433ns1.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>
The one you made before was a little bit better because of the text.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top