vista

http://theinquirer.net/?article=30601 But witch user on this forum bother's to buy a crappy oem machine anyway (unless of course it's for a good price & has good specs, or an alienware pc).

After checking and doublechecking the vista site (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/) I've come to the conclussion that there is absolutely -no- reason for me to go with Vista.. What is so special about Vista that you can't do with WinXP or even Win2k? Window-previews in taskbar? I have it...

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30503 Look at that ;_;. Looks like I should save my pennies for 4gb of memory.

http://www.gamespot.com/features/6143883/p-4.html Read that, it's an article about Vista and DirectX10 combined. Does anyone actually know if DirectX10 will also work on XP?

http://theinquirer.net/?article=30128 I think we have the reason for why they reccomend 2gb of memory for vista.

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1697,1931946,00.asp *Ahem* What are you talking Smith? That link always worked... :)

It has nothing on XGL. (you may want to get a fresh box of tissues before launching this) http://www.freedesktop.org/~davidr/xgl-demo1.xvid.avi (57.9 megs) That's completely rendered by your graphics card (even a 4-5 year old card can run it), so 0% CPU load. Requires less CPU to render...

Which do you perfer? Windows Vista is going to compete with the Mac OS Tiger somehow, and yet they have some features that are better and bad. I personally tried them both even with the beta and it's pretty good, but I perfer Vista more than the Mac OS. It's okay but it's good for like web...

M$ released the name for their new OS formerly code named Longhorn. Windows Vista. The beta is out for testers now. I personally can't wait for this thing to be released, but it looks like it won't be out until last quarter 2006. Here are some screenshots. That's the new...