new ANIMATED gohan sig w00t w00t

New Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2003
Messages
307
Best answers
0
I fealt like makin an animated sig, so i wipped one up in about a half hour. Crits, comments? And please no "i dont like people in sigs" or anything like that.

 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Messages
1,207
Best answers
0
well, the effect is nice, but its reall easy to make man, but does look really cool.
 
New Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2003
Messages
307
Best answers
0
Yes i know, it was really easy. Like i said:
-{VC}- sWiTcH said:
I fealt like makin an animated sig, so i wipped one up in about a half hour.
lol
EDIT: also, I'd like to know if you think I should keep my current sig or use the one I just made.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 16, 2003
Messages
1,162
Best answers
0
Wangster said:
well, the effect is nice, but its reall easy to make man, but does look really cool.
WHO CARES IF IT WAS EASYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY. Thats all you seem to care about:cry: lolz Stuff can be easy but made to look nice... so who cares about difficulty :D:D

The guy on the right doesnt really fit into the background.... and the text... where it says... S......w.....i....t....c.....h.... could be made a little faster :D other than that, its nice lol
 
New Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Messages
533
Best answers
0
the animation is nice i like that, but the bg n quality of the pic could be heaps better
 
New Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2003
Messages
307
Best answers
0
Ill remember that in the future, but that is kind of the final product b/c id have to make 80 new frames from scratch, and im lazy. So no one has answered my question yet, should i use my old sig or keep the new one i just made.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 16, 2003
Messages
1,162
Best answers
0
what was your old one? And you can use the tween animation to make it faster and easier
 
New Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2003
Messages
307
Best answers
0
No, not to make it faster, that would be easy. The hard part would be changing the bg and the pic. And my old one was this:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom