Work in progress, space scene

[Naz]

I just got a tablet today! A Wacom graphire studio xl, I love it!

And I got 10k page views aswell on devart, so, decided to get off my lazy butt and play around a bit with my new tool.



I've only done a bit, as you see, but enjoy what I see so far o:

edit: mhh, I don't like my planet..

 

[Growler]

Nice light source, but I think the planet is a bit... idk, a bit 2D? Sorry, it just doesn't look right

 

[jp]

Yeah,

The lightsource is really well done, nice brushings and such,

but the planet does look a little flat, I think because of the glow that's inside the planet.

Perhaps you should lessen that and then It might look better, and I mean the glow inside, not outside, if ya know what I mean.

But its a really good start.

 

[Growler]

With that type of light source from that direction, It would be more eclipsed.

 

[Naz]

I got

now,


I disagree with your interpetation of the light source growler, it's not comming from the back, rather on about 10/11 on the top

I'ma do some tuts on planets and starfields:\

 

[ZeroNightmare]

i think its really cool... except for the planet.

 

[PiXel]

 

[LaHeen]

Well, the planted dosnt really need clouds.. It could be a planet without clouds.. ^_^. Looking good dude.

 

[Optimus Prime]

Why does the planet need clouds? And if he removed what you suggested, it would look dumb, the explosion would just randomly stop.

 

[PiXel]

<_< that what i was looking for:
(sry for editing urs mate but i hope you get my suggestion)

 

[Majin_You]

Speaking strictly from an astronomy stand-point, he can have the cloud/remnant around the "explosion" the way he originally had it. Suppose it was a star exploding that created a planetary nebula...those don't often vanish below the exlplosion, they are quite spherical.

And I agree - the planet doesn't need clouds. Mercury doesn't have clouds (or an atmosphere, for that matter), last I checked.

Very well done from the git-go, Naz. I'm a big fan of spacey stuff. The planet, itself, is pretty well done. I cannot figure out what I'd say to correct on it, though, since I'm not really into the lingo you guys use when creating such images (my apologies ). The explosion/star/whatever it is with the surrounding dust/gas is VERY nice. All you need to do, now, is make a picture of the ring nebula. If you did that, I'd have to bear your children.

 

[Naz]

My toughts exxactly maj, I think that the explosion is a lot more likely to be radial instead of only ~140 degrees

I did work on the atmosphere, aby adding an emission nebula in the background. a few stars added, I really don't want to overdo it like in that last pic. I didnt give it an atmosphere, but I could have. By far, not all planets have atmospheres. I also did some changes to the planet so it looks a bit less embossed. Also, putting stars in front of the planet is impossible Tryforce, as stars are a LOT bigger then planets, putting a star thats 1/1000 the size of the planet is not realistic.

However, thanks for the help as it did help me a lot

here's what it's now

 

[Skiwan]

i really love the new version, u fixed whatever was bugging me about the planets surface in the first one, also the composition/layout looks perfect, i really love the gasses around it. Great work man, i love it.

tis my wallpaper now D:

 

[Eon]

Newest version rocks.

 

[Wangster]

dude, i knever knew that cud be done with my tablet :O i have the same one but i use it for drawing more then designing concepts like these.
i like the outcome, at first i didint really like it, planet looked flat and all, but it was alright, the latest version is verry cool when i compare it to the other one , Gj man, me wubs.