Sotm 6

[Mr.Lukyas]

Lith, plz choose the render/stock.

Stick this, mr. admin.

 

[elcor]

i like this

 

[Mr.Lukyas]

I am sorry. But it is Lith who decides.

 

[elcor]

why? .....

 

[MF29]

why? .....

Because he won the last SOTW contest, whereas, you did not.

 

[elcor]

ok i dont know this .

 

[Suh Dude]

10charslulz

 

[-Origin]

My entry, for now.

 

[Suh Dude]

Drop the shadows

 

[elcor]

My entry

 

[MF29]

Idea, how about anonymizing each of the signatures so people will not know who made the signatures? It will destroy any type of popularity contest.

We can PM Lukyas the signatures, and from there Lukyas can post up the signatures without names, with the addition of masking the title of the file and the links so users cannot find out who made the signature if it becomes that serious.

 

[Mr.Lukyas]

I kinda like the idea.
In the case peepz do not agree with it I have to ask you something guys. If you attend to post better sig later, and you already sent a bad sig, please remove the old sig and just leave the one you are contesting with. I had a bit of problems with opening a poll last time, because Elcor and some other guys have sent 2 or more sigs, and only the last one was "the one".

Anyway, who is for Gryph's idea?

 

[Suh Dude]

Idea, how about anonymizing each of the signatures so people will not know who made the signatures? It will destroy any type of popularity contest.

We can PM Lukyas the signatures, and from there Lukyas can post up the signatures without names, with the addition of masking the title of the file and the links so users cannot find out who made the signature if it becomes that serious.

Wouldn't really work because:

1) This is a Signature of the Month. Yes, it's your style and work which is why its a signature.
2) Signatures without names could end up someone stealing it and putting their name on it on another forum.
3) There's a popularity contest? Lol

 

[MF29]

1) This is a Signature of the Month. Yes, it's your style and work which is why its a signature.

Right, but what does this prove? It just defines what SOTW is.

2) Signatures without names could end up someone stealing it and putting their name on it on another forum.

Ok

3) There's a popularity contest?

Sometimes, this can be the case, where a person will vote for a signature just because of the person who made it.

 

[Suh Dude]

Right, but what does this prove? It just defines what SOTW is.

Uh yeah I didn't think that one through... >_>

 

[Dark_Gogeta]

2) Signatures without names could end up someone stealing it and putting their name on it on another forum.

u can rip a signature havin his name on it too... its prty simple so it doesnt matter.. somebody will steal it anyways >_> (damn bastards)

 

[|Xiphos|]

Itssss true... Even the popularity contest...

 

[TigerGEO]

entering this one nice entrance origin!

 

[MF29]

Could I get some yes or no agreements please?

 

[-Origin]

I kinda like it.