My point, again, is that creationists accepted what scientists said about the age of the tree in California. They accepted that scientists were able to accurately judge that particular tree's age, and because it supposedly fell in line with their way of thinking, it was beautiful. Science backed them up and the Bible was to be taken literally hence forth. Granted, they took the lowest estimation, rather than the oldest in order to make their convoluted "theory" work out.
And now scientists have made a new discovery, and using the same technique have determined these trees to be 8000 years old. If they say the Earth is supposed to be 6000 years old, and this new tree is 8000 years old, someone is making a huge mistake. Personally, I'm siding with the people who know what they're talking about. I can't help it. I'm a sucker for evidence staring me right in my face. I'm not going to pretend it doesn't exist.