Live free or die by the sword
Retired Forum Staff
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Jeeze Kurt, it's messy, yes, but that was brutal 
i think the layout is fine, its the navigation i would be more concerend with
majority rules, its simple as that.
and why should a site owner have to go through "extra trouble" for 5 people that are so bent against anything popular they simply cannot bear to use it.
thats kinda like saying you shouldnt force people from england to drive on the right side of the road in the usa....Bolteh said:
majority rules, its simple as that.
and why should a site owner have to go through "extra trouble" for 5 people that are so bent against anything popular they simply cannot bear to use it.
Bolteh2
B
Guest
dude, its just a simple fact of webdesign (believe me.... ive had webdesign classes for over 4 years.. add to that the management and copyright law and you cant beat me on this...)
sitesq shouls be coded in universal code.. not inet explorer only code
sitesq shouls be coded in universal code.. not inet explorer only code
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2003
- Messages
- 468
- Best answers
- 0
/me checks the source
The CSS code you speak of is a comment, why its there is beyond me but it means nothing to the site. He puts < !-- -- > (minus the spaces) before and after respectivly, then adds a < /style> tag... Why I do not know...
Why did you continue with your HTML *after* the < /html> tag? Its there for a reason you know o_o
Overall the site looks *decent*, but you should try and make it compatable with "all" of the browsers, and cleaning it up a bit. The code itself looks pretty sloppy *coughs at frontpage*
The CSS code you speak of is a comment, why its there is beyond me but it means nothing to the site. He puts < !-- -- > (minus the spaces) before and after respectivly, then adds a < /style> tag... Why I do not know...
Why did you continue with your HTML *after* the < /html> tag? Its there for a reason you know o_o
Overall the site looks *decent*, but you should try and make it compatable with "all" of the browsers, and cleaning it up a bit. The code itself looks pretty sloppy *coughs at frontpage*
i maked the page in dreamwaver and i don`t even look at the code... i only look at the code when i need to add a include tag!!!!
For the iframe **** you say.. i can`t use tables there becourse pafiledb is finda hard to include in the code!!! it is possible but than i must code everything arround the pafiledb stuff instead of just including it in the layout... and if you want to help me with fixing the site so that it can be watched on all browsers than add me on msn.
For the iframe **** you say.. i can`t use tables there becourse pafiledb is finda hard to include in the code!!! it is possible but than i must code everything arround the pafiledb stuff instead of just including it in the layout... and if you want to help me with fixing the site so that it can be watched on all browsers than add me on msn.
Bolteh2
B
Guest
hes talking bout doing tables for the main layout... then add an iframe with 0,0 coords in an open cell...
Lost in space
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2003
- Messages
- 814
- Best answers
- 0
CSS code is supposed to be placed in comments, that way older browsers that don't know how to parse CSS don't attempt to.SoulStriker said:
There is no way that was made in Dreamweaver. The first thing Dreamweaver adds to an HTML file when it creates it is...
PHP:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<title>Untitled Document</title>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>