my 3rd sig, getting better...

New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jul 9, 2003
Messages
1,388
Best answers
0


yeah this is my 3rd thing cooked up from photoshop. whatcha think?
 

jp

New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
1,561
Best answers
0
Well, i like the trunks that stands there with the text, i do,

But, the quality of the other trunks "ssj in the back of the normal" is of low quality, the out line of it is to pixelish...... and the normal trunks isn't cut out well... maybe you should try to blend it more in... a little bit of blurring can help allot you know.

And because the sig is done with emboss, or at least it seems so, and the other trunks is not, it looks a bit off.

Not bad for a 3rd one though, not at all. :)
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jul 9, 2003
Messages
1,388
Best answers
0
no emboss in it, just the ssjtrunks is faded, and i have trouble cutting picvs out.
 
New Member
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
151
Best answers
0
Not bad for youre 3rd try
one crit try using high quality pictures.
 
brainfeeder
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 29, 2002
Messages
5,179
Best answers
0
Hmm, where do I start?

First, the images on the left lacks not only quality, but effect the obvious layout issue. Second, the border is not something I normally recommend, it's way to thick and kind of gives the sig another expression of low quality. Third, let's talk about that font, not only does it almost blue into the BG, but it's not a color I would recommend in this situation. I'd would go with a darker blue, or something that matches the border. The only positive thing about this sig is the image on the right, it actually has a bit of high quality to it, but you innapropiately faded it into the sig.

To improve this one, I recommend making the border top the layer, so that it wraps entirely around the sig. Speaking of the border, I recommend something a little thinner and less complex. Also, the image layout needs a big improvement. I recommend at keeping the image on the right, and focusing on try to finer another one matches it in quality and appearance.

To rate this sig, I'd have to sadly give it a 3/10.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jul 9, 2003
Messages
1,388
Best answers
0
well heres a better version.


The boarder was just the burn tool, and i darkend the font so its more readable. i also added another trunks and moved the other to the side more. I like the fade look.. and i couldnt find similar better quality pics for the left. i blured the edges and on the ssj left one i fixed the pixelated edges.

all this being said, is this better or worse? i mean i like it all.
 
brainfeeder
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 29, 2002
Messages
5,179
Best answers
0
I'd say it's worse... way too complicated now, and I recommend a new border style.

Also, like I said, the two images on the right are very low quality.

2/10
 

jp

New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 23, 2003
Messages
1,561
Best answers
0
RavenTrunks said:
well heres a better version.


The boarder was just the burn tool, and i darkend the font so its more readable. i also added another trunks and moved the other to the side more. I like the fade look.. and i couldnt find similar better quality pics for the left. i blured the edges and on the ssj left one i fixed the pixelated edges.

all this being said, is this better or worse? i mean i like it all.
Emmmm its like that ssj trunks with sword wants to kill normal trunks... :p
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top