fryd4good said:
First of all, the Catholic Church would probably sooner host an annual festival honoring Satan than support *** marriage. Next, if ***s were meant to marry and pursue relationships together, then they would be able to have kids. The fact that it's biologically impossible for two *** people to have kids, with no female involvment at all, tells us all we need to know. Also, if being *** were in any way "normal" then we would see it occur naturally in animals. Since it doesn't, we then can reason that being *** is something humans, in their typical abnormal way, fabricated. The fact that humans' ways defy nature has already caused a lot of damage. In a society of all *** people, the human race would fail. Makes you wonder, maybe no species was MEANT to evolve as much of we have. Anyhow, not sure why I bothered to write all this. It's just weird when you wonder about stuff like that.
Fortunately for us, the Catholic church has been revealed as, over the past few hundred years, as a thoroughly corrupt institution--from their policy and inaction during World War II, and more specifically their inaction to punish priests they knew were molesting children. Only when the public learned so many priests were doing it (relatively) and that the Church had done
nothing except move them around, did the church do anything.
Not many people know this, but it
is possible to create a baby from two female or two male reproductive cells, using modern gene extraction methods. It's prohibitely expensive, and you still need a surrogate mother to have the baby. (But it won't be hers, at all.) This has been done before, I believe seven or eight times, successfully.
Anyway, homosexuality is prevalent in nature--almost any species you can name, has had known cases of homosexuality. While it goes against human nature--(that is, the need for self preservation--passing on your genes to the next generation), it is still common in Humans, and almost every species.
They're entitled to their love, and entitled to their marriage.. You don't have to see them doing anything, except holding hands or kissing in public, which most don't do. Even if you do see that, you should have the maturity not to freak out, considering I doubt you would if you saw two women, rather then men, doing it.
Many people are biased in this matter--It's okay for two women (Well, more okay then two men) to do it, but the reverse isn't true. Men get turned on by lesbians, and repulsed by homosexual men. I find this contradiction to be amusing, anyway..
To sum up:
-People have a right to "the pursuit of happiness" to a certain degree.. and since samesex marriage hurts no one, and makes 10% of the population happy, who is anybody to interfere?
-Homosexuality isn't something new, contrary to many people's beliefs--Bisexuality and homosexuality were always present in the same amount as today, people were never open about it, because of ignorant people being filled with hatred by their families/religions/etc.
-You don't have to condone it, just tolerate it. Nobody is passing around flyers and saying "BE A HOMOSEXUAL! IT'S BETTER!" unlike the evangelists who go around trying to convert people. *cough*
-Doesn't hurt anyone, just makes some people happy. If you're too intolerant to handle it, then quite frankly.. you should analyze what kind of person you
really are--especially if you're turned on by "Woman on Woman Action."
P.S.: I find it offensive that the word "g a y" is filtered out by the system. Words like ASS are allowed in, but not "g a y"? I understand the "f a..etc" word being censored, but why the other?
