- Jun 18, 2003
- Best answers
Are you saying the government faked the Pearl Harbor bombings too? Don't make me laugh. When disasters involve the deaths of innocents, they always attract conspiracies because it's easier for people to believe some complex bull**** than to get over the facts of what actually happened.Its Pearl Harbor all over again.
What's up with people saying, "ya this topic needs to be closed cuz i say so lolz o yea im not a mod", recently? If you don't like the topic, don't post in it. If a topic needs to be closed, the moderators will handle it.Tassadar said:This thread needs to be closed, this topic has already been discussed before and it only leads to flaming.
Very compelling indeed. Indeed. That's why i have pictures here in my house (my fathers a pilot) of books and books of pictures with a massive airplane smasshed through the pentagon? Or perhaps because if a bomb or multiple bombs exploded in the twin towers like said: then how in gods name would the twin towers collapse if the bombs were not at the base of the towers. Take a banana, stick a small firework in the top of it and explode it. What happens? the top of the banana blows off. It won't "collapse" same with the twin towers. 2 planes smashed into it. That's reason enough for me to say oh, maybe the velocity at which the planes were traveling maybe weakened the twins structure?Sub said:Whose to say everything in the video is true. There are some very compelling pieces of evidence though, Fire. For example, the fact that there was no wreckage of the plane at the Pentagon. The fact that both of the Twin Towers collapsed from a fire, them being the only buildings in history to ever completely collapse from a fire. The fact that the building that was hit second, the building that wasn't even hit dead on collapsed first. The fact that the video of Al Queda admitting they were responsible for the attacks had Bin Laden talking with a watch and ring on, something forbidden by Islamic law. The fact that in the video they found, he was using his right hand, but he is infact left handed. The fact that every black box was destroyed entirely, something made to withstand exactly that type of situation, yet a piece of paper linking the attack to Al Queda managed to survive and be found? I could go on, but Iâm just doing this off the top of my head here.
So there is a lot of compelling evidence to look at. Some of it may not be true, but some of it does make you wonder.
Cruise Missiles typically come from boats and move far faster than cruising airliners. The theory that there could have been a smaller plane with a missile on it is still out there. I'm not sure missiles sound like airliners either, considering that they are much smaller, more aerodynamic, and much faster.Fire Phoenix said:Last I checked a cruise missile has a jet on it, omg, what was that? A jet you say? What's on an airplane, A jet. So that means that a cruise missle can go as fast as a jet propelled plane, so any commercial plane. 500 mph roughly.
I'd show you had I a scanner. Go to barns and noble. By a sept. 11 book.Sonic Boyster said:Cruise Missiles typically come from boats and move far faster than cruising airliners. The theory that there could have been a smaller plane with a missile on it is still out there. I'm not sure missiles sound like airliners either, considering that they are much smaller, more aerodynamic, and much faster.
Also note that bombs planted along the walls and along structural components might not be easily visible or noticeable by everyday people.
And what is this picture you speak of with a plane in the pentagon? Show us. Apparently you have a picture no one else in the world has ever seen.