J . I . N ..

New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
3,746
Best answers
0
The render is bad, and the lightning effect hurts my eyes.

Bg is good.

8/10
 
New Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2004
Messages
245
Best answers
0
It wasn't a render, was a stock image, but yeah it was low quality...:scared:
 
New Member
★ Black Lounger ★
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
4,628
Best answers
0
the lighting = ugh, the rest = sexeh D:

The stock is not bad, looks damn sexy, I have a medium quality version, to me its awesome :p
 
New Member
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 29, 2003
Messages
4,765
Best answers
0
Location
The Netherlands
Do get rid of it, because it makes the whole sig look ugly. And also add a 1px black border, or some other kind of border...whatever. Sigs without borders don't blend in with the forum nicely.
 
New Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
170
Best answers
0
Yeah it looks like you have that same lightning most of your signature and in this it doesn't fit at all.

So like Sicron said, get rid of it because it really kills your signature(s). :E
 
New Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
170
Best answers
0
:yes:
Well it's better now because of borders but I still dont like that kind of "light source". :p
 
New Member
✔️ HL Verified
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 29, 2003
Messages
4,765
Best answers
0
Location
The Netherlands
What kind of logic is that? Every signature needs a lightsource? Sorry, but 99 of the 100 sigs that use a lightsource get screwed up. Just like yours in this case. Thye just make the signature to bright and make the colors less vibrant and more dull.
 
New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
515
Best answers
0
Every signature needs consistency, meaning that if you have one image with a lightsourc eplaced in the upper left corner, you can't have a second image with a lightsource on the upper right.

In your case (and I'm referring to your current signatrue of Jin), you have the ugly lightblob in the upperright corner, and then you have this image of Jin with a lightsource in the upper right corner. Explain please?


In either case, the lightblob screws up your signature. Get rid of it or use it more wisely, but not like this.
 
New Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2004
Messages
245
Best answers
0
That stock image I used already had a sort of light blob in that area, i've just added to it a little, thats probably what is causing it.

@sicron - You need a lightsource in every signature, it looks nice but more importantly gives depth. Go to any good gfx forum and they will tell you the
same. This signature is a different story, because I messed up somewhere and the stock image isn't that good.
 
New Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2004
Messages
245
Best answers
0
wow whered you get that? the one I used was kinda like that but it was smaller and its missing a couple things.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
2,417
Best answers
0
i like your current best.

but i dont know whats up with the checker pattern thing.... like you saved transparency in the wrong format or something
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
3,746
Best answers
0
Why did you name the thread Jin?
 
New Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2005
Messages
148
Best answers
0
nice tag!! i like that style very much.. and the colors you choose for this style are very attractive and genuine.. id like to get a hang of that style myself.. oh as everybody mentioned you should lower the optacity of the lightsource.. cause the whole tag has very light colors in it.. and i think those kind of tags need LQ stocks just like you did.. :D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom