Its not about the fact people agree with him or like him, its about being overrated, and taking his word as gold dust, which a lot of people seem to do. I see faults in everything he's ever written, I find his articles always have some sort of superiority complex that appeals to the majority of the adolescents of this generation. He's about I know more than you (while only explaining one side arguements), rather than, this is what I know, here are my conclusions, think about it. To me, that makes him a bad writer, he belongs in tabloids or something as shallow with such mass appeal, oh, like the internet. I do agree with some of the things he says but he never hits the nail on the head, and you never will when you don't accept both sides to every subject. When you're appealing to the latest generation and giving such bias views on the world, to me I find his articles a sort of harmful influence on young peoples way of thinking, it just perpetuates the same narrow minded attitudes. Hate's a strong word, but I think thats enough of a reason for me to dislike him.