If you know HTML you don't use Dreamweaver anyways.Fire Phoenix said:Meh, I feel that photoshop + Dreamweaver = a hell of a lot better than google.
But it looks great for people who don't know HTML or Java.
Not true. I know html- But i like to use Dreamweaver because it does the work for me. Or most of it anyways. I'm too lazy to open up notepad and do everything from scratch.Kurt` said:If you know HTML you don't use Dreamweaver anyways.
This probably won't replace Dreamweaver/Frontpage, but it's better than Geocities/Yahoo page builder haha
ya thats what im using for school webpage project, cept i already have everything set up on geocities, oh well.. next timeFire Phoenix said:Meh, I feel that photoshop + Dreamweaver = a hell of a lot better than google.
I recommend using Notepad ++. It's also does the work, but you have to open the file manually if you want to see the changes you made to it.Fire Phoenix said:Not true. I know html- But i like to use Dreamweaver because it does the work for me. Or most of it anyways. I'm too lazy to open up notepad and do everything from scratch.
Don't forget:Sicron said:Search Engine
And a whole lot more, yup....Google is going for World Domination =P
Pride, do you know what you're talking about? Coding HTML yourself has nothing to do with what your site looks like when you code it in Dreamweaver. It just means that you suck ass at HTML and you should practice it. But if you're using the images with dreamweaver to make a website then yes, it will look retarted. I don't like the style of Dreamweaver, so that's why I use Notepad and Notepad++ It's cool I guess that google is making more stuff, but free website makers = LOSESaiyanPrideXIX said:Yikes. Using Dreamweaver produces some pretty ugly HTML, if I remember correctly. You have to know what your doing really well to avoid weird tagging. But then again I haven't used Dreamweaver in about 4 years, heh.
That google bit seems like a great alternative to people who use crap like Geo****ties or Angelfire.