can i handle half life 2?

New Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
49
Best answers
0
i have a 2.4 ghz cpu with a gforce 4 mx 420 or somethin like that i dont exactly know anyway if this isnt good enough can some one tell me what i need and what it might cost me? thanks
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 5, 2002
Messages
1,495
Best answers
0
Well your processor is fine.. the video card could be better. For HL2 go with a newer ATI card (allthough I don't really know where your GeForce 4 mx 420 stands quality wise). How much RAM do you have and waht kind? If you have 512 or over, I think you'll be allright.
 
New Member
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
842
Best answers
0
The minimum system spec is currently targeted at a 700 MHz PC with 128 MB RAM and a DX6-level video card, eg: TNT2 etc, meaning you won't need a supercomputer to run Half-Life 2 but don't expect to see reflective water,dynamic shadows and bump-mapped textures.

The game running at reasonable detail eg: 25/40 fps, requires a 1600Mhz cpu, 256 mb ram, GeForce4 Ti or Ati Radeon card.

In real life you need the best from a new game so I would recommend a 2000 cpu, or higher 512 mb ram or higher, GeForce4 Ti4800 128 ddr or ATI Radeon 9600 pro.
IF you've got the money ATI Radeon 9800 pro. or Geforce FX5900 ultra
The more power the better but not essential with this game.
Google does wonders now-a-days.
 

Lid

L
Guest
You can only handle it if you've been trained by Hulk Hogan.

(Get a better graphics card, and how much RAM what?)
 
New Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2004
Messages
292
Best answers
0
at least dont keep this videocard.
i had the geforce 4 mx 440 ...
but it's an upgraded geforce 2 so it's really nothing special.
this card is old and for the games that will be coming out you would do best to get a new videocard
especially for the new games coming out like half life2 , doom3 (recent release doh :p ) and games in the near future

btw you cant even play some specific games with that card like prince of persia sands of time and splinter cell 1. because the card is old so they dont support the cipset anymore.
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Messages
1,178
Best answers
0
if you are a geforce freak then you nead the fx 5950 or the 6800, and for the ati freak you nead the Radeon 9800 or the x800 <-cant remember the exact name

the choice is yours.
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Messages
2,725
Best answers
0
I'd recommend an ATI card, since they're supposedly designed more around the HL2 engine, like how the Nvidia cards are designed more around the Doom 3 engine.
Go with a video card upgrade first. If you've got money to spend after that, and you're able to, get an extra 512MB or 256MB stick of RAM.
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Sep 20, 2003
Messages
3,211
Best answers
0
Tassadar said:
Google does wonders now-a-days.
couldnt agree more.

also get a better video card, if your going toward hl2, ATI deffinately. they are designed for games like that. but they come at a huge price. i bought the ati radeon 9800 pro for $265. And where i live thats pretty expensive.(For people who live in the south: It's more expensive up here, but we get paid more so it evens out)

If you have money left over, buy a nother stick of 256 ram. and you'll have an even 512 ram. I dunno if you can have a stick of 256, and buy a 512... i dont think it works that way. maybe get rid of the 256 and buy 2 512's and you'll have a nice 1024 mb of ram. a good gb ^_^
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 14, 2003
Messages
1,929
Best answers
0
Tassadar said:
Google does wonders now-a-days.
Wrong ;P.

"According to studio boss Gabe Newell, the basic spec will call for a 1.2Ghz processor, 256Mb of RAM and a DirectX 7 capable graphics card, while the company is recommending a 2.4Ghz processor, 512Mb of RAM and a DirectX 9 card for those who want to see the game in all its glory."
Full article here:
http://forum.pcvsconsole.com/viewthread.php?tid=11761
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
2,490
Best answers
0
Sweet...I'm the recommended specs. Looks like I got this in the bag! Hehe.
 
New Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
122
Best answers
0
i have 2500+ barton @ 3200+, 512 mb ram @400mhz and a radeon 9800pro and hl2 beta got my fps to less than 10 :(:(:( hope they did sth 'bout it...
 

owa

New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 26, 2002
Messages
1,043
Best answers
0
SSJ3 GoHaN said:
i have 2500+ barton @ 3200+, 512 mb ram @400mhz and a radeon 9800pro and hl2 beta got my fps to less than 10 :(:(:( hope they did sth 'bout it...
That doesn't sound right.
 
New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2002
Messages
190
Best answers
0
The recommened specs for the full non leaked version of the game (shame on those that dled it) is about 1.0 ghz for the cpu. I think forgot about the ram and video card.
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 26, 2004
Messages
1,178
Best answers
0
w00t, i can run hl2 easely.
only nead a better ram and it's perfect, i've currend 256mb(going for 1gb)
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Dec 3, 2002
Messages
2,490
Best answers
0
SSJ3 GoHaN said:
i have 2500+ barton @ 3200+, 512 mb ram @400mhz and a radeon 9800pro and hl2 beta got my fps to less than 10 :(:(:( hope they did sth 'bout it...
I'm always fascinated by people who massively overclock bootleg processors...and then get confused when things don't work right. I bet if you'd clocked back down it would have been better.
 
New Member
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
842
Best answers
0
Actually the 2500 is simply a downclocked 3200. Not many people seem to know about that apparently. It is easily overclocked to 3200 with a couple fans.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
1,331
Best answers
0
If you own CZ, play the CS: S beta and find out for sure.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 14, 2003
Messages
1,929
Best answers
0
Arthos said:
If you own CZ, play the CS: S beta and find out for sure.
CS : S only has like 1/4 of the total technology that's in half life 2. It'll definitely play better, not very accurate performance test.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom