New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 21, 2003
Messages
1,207
Best answers
0
the second one is nice also, but the arrows dont make any sence, where are they pointing @ ??
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
1,887
Best answers
0
Yeah the text is kind of weak still, but its better than the 1st.
 
New Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2002
Messages
492
Best answers
0
well does anyone have any suggestions on fonts then....like a couple nice ones that work good.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 16, 2003
Messages
1,162
Best answers
0
Sugar, he said :
my art is secret
Does that help you? >.<;; :p

Stonehenge, Jester... or Weathered (BRK) might work... but I suck at choosing fonts :fight: I havent tried, so I dunno...
<FONT face="Stonehenge">Stonehenge.</FONT>
<FONT face="Weathered (BRK)">Weathered.</FONT>
<FONT face="Jester">Jester.</FONT>
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
1,887
Best answers
0
I'm not the best with fonts, but try some different ones, and mess with the opacitiy and blending.
 
New Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2002
Messages
380
Best answers
0
I say screw the rest of these heathens and go with the first one. But another possibilty is to keep that typography and try a more minimal typeset. I really do like that funky alignment set in the first one. You could try Arial Black, Futura, Univers, and possibly Helvetica or Folio.

And you know, you might even think about messing with type weights (in the same font family). Try using Futura, Futura light, Futura Medium, Futura black. That may accent the type even more.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom