~Gurbir~
๐ Beta Tester
โ
Black Lounger โ
โ๏ธ HL Verified
according to this guy
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/02/qa_turok
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/02/qa_turok
scientists create these theories in the hopes that technology will eventually advance enough in some way to prove it or that someone has a sudden spark and builds off of them. how do you think we got E=MC2? and, uh, theres not much that we can actually theorize on and be able to turn into law later.There's no real way to say if he's either right or wrong, unless any person can say they were around when the universe began (or ended as the case may be). Scientists should theorize useful things rather than stuff they'll never really be able to prove.
That's where star trek comes in, warp theory!i'm pretty sure you cant travel faster than the speed of light.
as you approach the speed of light energy gets converted into mass or something, and you expand.
my physics is half assed, I blame my student teacher.
Correct you cannot simply accelerate past light speed. Once you hit lightspeed it is impossible to move faster.i'm pretty sure you cant travel faster than the speed of light.
as you approach the speed of light energy gets converted into mass or something, and you expand.
my physics is half assed, I blame my student teacher.
Yup. That is totally "Outside-the-box" right there.Correct you cannot simply accelerate past light speed. Once you hit lightspeed it is impossible to move faster.
However faster then light means a lot of different things. Not just star trek style pure acceleration. Wormholes, spacial folding, and a few others are closer to real life FTL methods.
Nice.But you didn't.