alone

New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jun 9, 2002
Messages
1,028
Best answers
0
wow its been a while since i posted on this forum, but im back methinks ^_^

http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/6785298/
it looks much better full view.
4-5 hours more or less
ps only
comments and crits welcome and appreciated

ahhhhhhhhhhhgggg im not spitfire aaaaaaghhgggggggg
i used to be uslessresponse, then i changed my name to spiritfire
 
Lost in space
Banned
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Messages
0
Best answers
0
It's empty, Easy and not really attractive for my little picky eyes.
[edit]
The font is bad, The gradient is ugly, easy.. did i mention ugly?
that faded text with the 2D art, is .. bad, really out of place?
That ball, what is it? Some ugly lines with more ugly thing inside it? haha
Don't tell me that took you 5 hours, oh boy...
 

Valeska

V
Guest
its beautifull..
very fresh and clean...very relaxing...
perfect for an desktop :smile:

great work
btw : i can see the hours in it m8 good job
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
1,127
Best answers
0
IT's ok. But I agree on what *edit* Spin said.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jun 9, 2002
Messages
1,028
Best answers
0
ummmm spitfire? spin? yeah the circles supposed to resemble an eye so thats what that is. the hours was more messin around with the layer styles on the circle, im still gettin used to it
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Mar 21, 2002
Messages
1,887
Best answers
0
SPiN said:
It's empty, Easy and not really attractive for my little picky eyes.
[edit]
The font is bad, The gradient is ugly, easy.. did i mention ugly?
that faded text with the 2D art, is .. bad, really out of place?
That ball, what is it? Some ugly lines with more ugly thing inside it? haha
Don't tell me that took you 5 hours, oh boy...
dont be so harsh man

give him suggestions, dont just rag on him
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jun 9, 2002
Messages
1,028
Best answers
0
i dont mind, really, tho i suppose suggestions would help more than just trashing it
 
New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Messages
28
Best answers
0
The CGI is alright. Abit plain though.
Just not feeling the idea... Sorry.
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 3, 2002
Messages
1,097
Best answers
0
heeyy spitfire... looong time no see man!

I kinda agree with SPiN, it aint really worth 5 hours..
oh and that font is horribly outdated and overused...

and it looks alot like the mainstream art from the last 3 years.. wich I personally hate. *death to the trendwhores*

anyways keep it up and try to improve..

greetz, dudeman
 
Retired
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Messages
0
Best answers
0
yes please Spin try to give suggestions please.

I don't really like it either, basically because the lines etc stand out much. there is no depth in it at all. which I think you did try to create. I do understand your deeper meaning with 'Alone' and 'Fear' and 'Rejection', which is indeed nice.
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 3, 2002
Messages
1,097
Best answers
0
but in the other hand.. also overused..

it seems that whenever you put a word that has to do with sad or happy emotions in your art, it has a deeper meaning and its great...
ive seen too many WP's with those words in it, wich turns it a bit more into the mainstream art..
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 3, 2002
Messages
1,097
Best answers
0
oh, my bad... i tought spitfire actually came back, and i dont remember any spiritfire...

once again, sorry
 
Retired
Joined
Nov 24, 2001
Messages
0
Best answers
0
well that's true dudeman, a lot of people think it's kinda original, but in fact a lot of people use it. so indeed it becomes a bit of a trendy situation. which I think is inevitable for good ideas though :)
 
Lost in space
Banned
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Feb 3, 2002
Messages
1,097
Best answers
0
i think its fine if they want to put emotion into their art, but not just to make their art original.. its like.. you make a wallpaper, and to avoid unoriginality you slap a nice title on it.

art has to start with emotion, then work out whatever is needed to bring that emotion to life.. thats how i think..
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jan 17, 2003
Messages
1,276
Best answers
0
4 or 5 hrs??? that could be done in less than that time o_o ..........VERY PLAIN the low opacity just messed it up big time..Also the text isn't that good.The background looks like a gradient to me.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 29, 2002
Messages
2,343
Best answers
0
well...its kinda plain...but thats ok in some case,but not here...the colors are rather boring, and i dont really like the font..
if u spreaded abit more 2d on it,it would look better..
and um...it looks like u just took some random shapes and stuck em on dif' places in the img,imean...it looks as if the shapes in there have nothing to do with each other..
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Jun 9, 2002
Messages
1,028
Best answers
0
not spitfire buddy, im nowhere near as talented as him, i hardly can compare. Yes yes its overused i know, but like i said, it more more just a practice thing for tech and layer styles, which i'm still learning so it took me a while to get things how i wanted
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom