Akuma

brainfeeder
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 29, 2002
Messages
5,179
Best answers
0
Location
Florida
The image layout, in general, needs to be redone.

Also, the BG is is admirable, but the typography is lackluster.

3/10
 
Active Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 18, 2002
Messages
4,201
Best answers
0
.... dont like it...

1/10.... -.-" really... i really cant crit it... it ..is... ugly of my view.. Im sry ;) try to do a new one :p
 
New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2002
Messages
518
Best answers
0
The only thing wrong with it is the Akuma image seems horizontally streched but other than that nothing wrong with it! 7/10.

-SaN
 

3n

New Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2004
Messages
12
Best answers
0
Guru_San said:
The only thing wrong with it is the Akuma image seems horizontally streched
Akuma is naturally big like that. I have used that image before and he looked big horizontally, but that is just how he is.

Azn, they are not bad, I like both signatures. Good job.
 
Active Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 18, 2002
Messages
4,201
Best answers
0
much better... but...
The chara. you use is not matching to this SIG.
Better you use someone who isquite in his/herself .... its just the CHARA.

8/10
 
New Member
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
151
Best answers
0
thx for the comments guys.
but tryforce what is a chara? :scared:
im dutch and dumb :fight:


made a new one still a wip
im dont realy know what to do with my text :(

 
Active Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 18, 2002
Messages
4,201
Best answers
0
Character= Chara. (figur or person in ur sig)

Ayway... this one crashes! kick ass sig!
 
brainfeeder
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 29, 2002
Messages
5,179
Best answers
0
Location
Florida
I like the BG in this new one, a lot.

Just one thing, can I see the original image?

On the font, it's not that bad, just needs to be less crowded.

6/10
 
New Member
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
151
Best answers
0
Thx guys here is the stock picture that you asked for Hwoarang

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom