2 sigs

STRONGEST SAYIAN

  • NAPPA

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • GOHAN

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • RADDITZ

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • GOTEN

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • TRUNKS

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • PAN

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • VEGETA

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • GOKU

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • BARDOCK

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • GOGETA

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cheese

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
1,285
Best answers
0
So... What do you guys think ?






I'll get more Brushes when i'm not lazy. :p
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
3,746
Best answers
0
Both of them are over contrasted. The text on the second stands out too much and is bad at the same time.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Aug 27, 2006
Messages
1,285
Best answers
0
I actually Over Contrasted by purpose, to make them look better.
I agree with that 2nd's text, but i just tried to experiment some new 'styles' for that one too, i guess it was pretty stupid afterall. :p


---

I'm also using 0 @ Contrast, to make pictures look more better, so they might show up pretty snitchy to eyes if using high contrast.

Any more c&c ?
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
3,746
Best answers
0
I think it might be the fogginess of the signatures, and the grungy backgrounds I don't like, the first is good but it's hard to make out the focal.
 
New Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
May 13, 2003
Messages
2,904
Best answers
0
Origin Forums said:
The first one has great, great colours. It looks really moody and the stock fits in great. It's just sharp enough not to get bothered by. Good job.

Dave said it all about the second one, really. It's way oversaturated, and too sharp as well. I also think there's too many shades of blue in there. I don't really like this one.
My opinion.
 
Active Member
💻 Oldtimer
Joined
Nov 18, 2002
Messages
4,201
Best answers
0
first one is sooooo great.

second one doesnt flow to well to the stock.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top